Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breer on Tepper, Rhule and the Panthers quarterback options


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

From his latest mailbag (link)

From Teppers Fake Brass Balls (@ATh2o88): What is your prediction on what the Panthers do at the QB position this offseason? And will it be enough to save Rhule’s job this fall?

That’s a colorful name you’ve got there, Tepper. And I actually do think the Panthers owner, David Tepper, may have had an inadvertent impact on Carolina’s position with this offseason’s available quarterbacks.

Tepper still hasn’t publicly backed Matt Rhule. My feeling is that it hurt Carolina in its ability to hire staff, for the same reason it could hurt the team with quarterbacks—a lack of certainty regarding where the team will be a year from now necessarily means less stability for everyone involved. Now, maybe even if Tepper were to say something, it wouldn’t have made a difference with assistant coaches and won’t with a quarterback. But the silence certainly didn’t help with the former and won’t help with the latter.

That’s why my feeling is the Panthers will probably wind up with a quarterback who sees opportunity in Charlotte to fight for his viability as an NFL starter. Which is to say my guess is it winds up being someone like Jimmy Garoppolo.

_________________________

Side Note: Did this question come from the Huddler with that same screen name? 🤔

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

The logic of the predictions are mind boggling 

The QB that couldn’t win

1.  with a great coaching staff

2. and a loaded team

will succeed in Carolina’s 3 year and growing dumpster fire 

I lay this fully at Tepper’s feet. No one else 

Breer didn't say he'd succeed.

He just said he or someone on his level is likely what we'll end up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

The logic of the predictions are mind boggling 

The QB that couldn’t win

1.  with a great coaching staff

2. and a loaded team

will succeed in Carolina’s 3 year and growing dumpster fire 

I lay this fully at Tepper’s feet. No one else 

I don't think the logic is that deep.

1) Who wants to be/remain a starter bad enough to disregard the fact there could be a coaching change after their first year?

I don't think success is associated with this situation at all.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I don't think the logic is that deep.

1) Who wants to be/remain a starter bad enough to disregard the fact there could be a coaching change after their first year?

I don't think success is associated with this situation at all.

Someone desperate for game tape.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

The logic of the predictions are mind boggling 

The QB that couldn’t win

1.  with a great coaching staff

2. and a loaded team

will succeed in Carolina’s 3 year and growing dumpster fire 

I lay this fully at Tepper’s feet. No one else 

I mean I'd be pissed if we traded for Garoppolo but the dude is in large part a winner.  33-14 as a starting QB in the regular season and 4-2 in the postseason.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I could say the train wreck was over and this season will just be the remnants playing out the damage already done.

I can't, though.

They will somehow grab another QB, climb onto another train and look for another chance to derail the franchise. And trading away our first next season, or for multiple years, is definitely in their wheelhouse.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...