Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I’ve held out hope…. I’m switching sides


Actionman0z
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

why now?

slow reaction lol

 

Im still on board. Yes Rhule has made mistakes but I have faith.

- I think the FO is doing a good job. I really like Fitt and hope that if we move on from Rhule he stays. 

- We have an elite defense. 

- We have play makers on offense. 

- We are going to rebuild the o-line this year.

 

It all comes down to the QB play. 

- If we roll out with Darnold and he sucks, well Rhule will get canned and we bring in a new coach and have a top draft pick. 

- If Darnold plays good then thats, good!... still might not save Rhule. 

 

I support this team and have faith they will put put it together... and if not then Tepper will make changes. 

It will be ok 🙂 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

slow reaction lol

 

Im still on board. Yes Rhule has made mistakes but I have faith.

- I think the FO is doing a good job. I really like Fitt and hope that if we move on from Rhule he stays. 

- We have an elite defense. 

- We have play makers on offense. 

- We are going to rebuild the o-line this year.

 

It all comes down to the QB play. 

- If we roll out with Darnold and he sucks, well Rhule will get canned and we bring in a new coach and have a top draft pick. 

- If Darnold plays good then thats, good!... still might not save Rhule. 

 

I support this team and have faith they will put put it together... and if not then Tepper will make changes. 

It will be ok 🙂 

That’s my belief right here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

slow reaction lol

 

Im still on board. Yes Rhule has made mistakes but I have faith.

- I think the FO is doing a good job. I really like Fitt and hope that if we move on from Rhule he stays. 

- We have an elite defense. 

- We have play makers on offense. 

- We are going to rebuild the o-line this year.

 

It all comes down to the QB play. 

- If we roll out with Darnold and he sucks, well Rhule will get canned and we bring in a new coach and have a top draft pick. 

- If Darnold plays good then thats, good!... still might not save Rhule. 

 

I support this team and have faith they will put put it together... and if not then Tepper will make changes. 

It will be ok 🙂 

I have in this team to.....but not with rule in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

It all comes down to the QB play. 

- If we roll out with Darnold and he sucks, well Rhule will get canned and we bring in a new coach and have a top draft pick. 

- If Darnold plays good then thats, good!... still might not save Rhule.

Seems like the team is making it pretty clear Darnold is done here. Besides there is no scenario where Sam plays "good" through a full season. He is the same QB he was in NY and USC. Let it go. Even Jets fans are laughing at this pipe dream.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...