Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Putting this in the Universe... I would take Jordan Love over any QB in this draft..

WOW!!

By WOW!!,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I just then Green Bay would have traded Rodgers if Love was showing any promise. Imagine the haul they would get to build around him. Instead they threw out stupid money to a 36 year old QB. It’s a bit of a red flag IMO. 

How tradable is Rodgers though? We all know he's a talent and 4 time MVP, but from all reports he's also a colossal asshole and that can ruin a locker room. I'm not saying there's not teams that wouldn't trade a boatload for him, including us. I just wonder how much his attitude would play into any trade talks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

How tradable is Rodgers though? We all know he's a talent and 4 time MVP, but from all reports he's also a colossal asshole and that can ruin a locker room. I'm not saying there's not teams that wouldn't trade a boatload for him, including us. I just wonder how much his attitude would play into any trade talks. 

Are you serious? The reigning MVP QB would be VERY tradeable.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Sam had 3 years worth of data ppl refused to see..

This kid had 2 games .. 

But ofcourse again some QBS get chance after chance.. Hell even Kyle Allen has more opportunities at this point ha ha!!

He might have only had 2 games but he also had 2 years in their system, at their practice and in their building.

GB spent a very high draft pick on him for one reason and one reason only, to replace Rodgers, the fact the are resigning Rodgers to the biggest contract ever tells you exactly what they think of Love, and they should know Love better than any team out there.

If they had any hope for Love they could have easily traded Rodgers for a haul, but they didn’t. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

How tradable is Rodgers though? We all know he's a talent and 4 time MVP, but from all reports he's also a colossal asshole and that can ruin a locker room. I'm not saying there's not teams that wouldn't trade a boatload for him, including us. I just wonder how much his attitude would play into any trade talks. 

Denver would have given them what they gave for Russ easily IMO. I mean they hired their coach based on acquiring him. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
demcj Community Regular

demcj

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

And the Falcons had Zero confidence in Farve..

the falcons had zero confidence in themselves and were a train wreck when farve was there. it's on record that then head coach jerry glanville didn't like farve and had zero intentions of playing him. the story is, he even tried to embarrass farve in front of everyone by telling him he meant to "draft the guy from mississippi state", brett being from southern miss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Are you serious? The reigning MVP QB would be VERY tradeable.

A team would probably have to give up 1sts and 2nds for the next 3 years, 50m a year in salary, and players to get Rodgers because hes the reigning MVP. Kupp should have won it, but that's position politics.

Trading for Rodgers would be for a win now shot because the price tag would decimate the team. Either that or you trust your GM to nail rounds 3-7 and UDFA to be able to compete for the next 4 years. Rodgers also won't draw the FAs for less like Brady did. 

My point is how many teams are willing, able, and have the stock to trade that are in position to win now. And then you also have to hope his drama queen attitude doesn't come into play. It's a lot of factors and they all come into play to different extents. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

He's terrible.  He's played actual games and been unimpressive and there have been numerous reports that teammates have said he sucks.

I would rather see if we can get Huntley from Baltimore, Re-sign Cam, and/or draft Willis.

So pay more for Huntley who isn't as nearly talented because he looked okay in a few games??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • bandu
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By bandu · Posted

      if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...