Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Whole lot of Deshaun Watson chatter happening out there

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

 

Speaking as the husband of someone who's survived more than one form of sexual victimization, what would you suggest I tell her to explain how watching a football team win is more important than her feelings?

I’m surprised she remained a fan after the cowboys signed Greg hardy.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Smittymoose said:

To not watch football if she cannot restrain from imposing her personal feelings on a football team that is solely for entertainment. 

Personal feelings are all over entertainment now. That’s part of it now.  If we land Watson, I can still like other players in the team, but there will definitely be a dark cloud over our franchise. Let another franchise have him. It’s a terrible decision for the franchise with him not have legal issues. Throw those in and it’s disgraceful…

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

If, if is always used to brush aside what shouldn't be.  If you are alive you will interact with all kinds of people that if you knew them you would regret having even been in the room with.  There not much you can do if you are ignorant of the fact. Once you know what they are about then you are responsible for your actions beyond that.

Using political figures as some indication of right or wrong is the worst example you could have chosen.  Whether I vote or not depends entirely on what I know about the candidate.  There hasn't been anyone with voting for since it became eligible to vote 42 years ago.  So no, to answer your question neither the former or current dipsh!t is my choice or fault. fug you for making me go there. 

 

Using political figures and those that support them is the best example I could use. The reason you don't see it is because you don't want to see it. And fug you for trying to call people POS human beings just because they would support Watson coming here if he is not deemed criminally liable. There's a reason for American jurisprudence. There's a reason for criminal and civil law. There's also a nuanced distinction between pervert and predator. 

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCTHFL0567 Experienced

NCTHFL0567

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

People will be upset if the trade goes down but they'll get over it eventually like everyone does with every other bad person in the nfl

Ray Lewis killed a guy FFS. Tyreke Hill punched his pregnant girlfriend in the stomach. Kareem Hunt knocked a chick out in an elevator. No one talks about that stuff though. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smittymoose Experienced

Smittymoose

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

And if those "entertainers" happen to victimize a few women along the way, that's okay as long as they keep "entertaining" us. Is that how it works?

I mean, it's not wrong as long as you're rich, famous or talented, right?

I don't think it's "okay," but I don't feel the need analyze the morality of every player that plays for the Carolina Panthers, no. The only thing that matters is whether they're good at football. Their morality does not impact their ability to perform on a football field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted

I'm petrified that we're going to do something stupid and give up multiple Firsts, plus other picks, and a player or two, for Watson.

We're not a contender if you add Watson right now, especially when it takes away our firsts for a few years and current starters.

It would reek of desperation and only backfire on us, we have far too many holes to fill, start to do that this year and draft a new QB next year in a better draft class.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Smittymoose said:

I don't think it's "okay," but I don't feel the need analyze the morality of every player that plays for the Carolina Panthers, no. The only thing that matters is whether they're good at football. Their morality does not impact their ability to perform on a football field. 

When it’s out there in your face it’s difficult to ignore. I’m not saying to do full background checks on everyone on the roster, but we KNOW he has been accused by a lot of women and are interested in him as a leader of this team? Where do you draw the line? Do you want Bill Cosby to help with scouting? How about Harvey Weinstein? 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Packersfan
      Seahawks or Rams

      By Packersfan · Posted

      Rams since you beat them already and they are 0-2 on the road against NFC South teams.
    • Pantherxtreme
      Seahawks or Rams

      By Pantherxtreme · Posted

      Let's say we take care of business against the Bucs and/or the Falcons take care of the Saints and we lock that 4th seed for the playoffs. Who do we root for this Sunday in the NFC West matchup with Seahawks at San Francisco winner takes the NFC West division. A Seahawks win would mean we face the Rams at home or with a 49ers win we host the Seahawks again.  Which opponent would most prefer? In the earlier Rams game we won primary due to turnovers specifically Mike Jackson pick-6 in combination with a good running game with Chuba and Rico whereas we kept the Rams offense off the field and Bryce was able to connect on two big 4th down throws for touchdowns. However when the Rams offense was on the field they pretty much got whatever they wanted, Williams and Corum gashed us in the run game, and we had no answer for Devonte Adams. Granted whe were missing some pieces on defense with Horn and Moehrig. Against Seattle our defense held it's own for the most part, it was our offense and turnovers which aided in the Panthers loss.  Seattle was the most stingy, best tackling defense the Panthers have played all season, and when we turned Darnold over we didn't do much with it.  The offense had no answers for what the defense was throwing at them and apparently were caught off guard by the amount of man coverage the Seahawks played.  With all that who do you think would be the better matchup the 2nd time around? I trust Stafford far more than I do Darnold, both running games are on par with each other, of the defenses Seattle has the dominant unit.  I personally prefer Seattle again, that would mark their 3rd consecutive road game, we've just played them, so we know exactly what to expect, and I feel Caneles should be able to come up with a better scheme to counteract what the Seahawks defense was doing, and we may be able to trip Darnold up, I don't want to try and win another shootout against the Rams.               
    • Shotgun
      Lowest Yards Per Completion...All Time.

      By Shotgun · Posted

      I remember watching him at bama and thinking he throws a lot of wobbly non spiral balls that have very little velocity. Knew it would be a real problem in the NFL and it is. 
×
×
  • Create New...