Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Three top 10 QB's refused to play for Matt Rhule.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

To add to it, I’m sick of people just bitching about Rhule every chance they get. It’s annoying and counterproductive. We know Zods stance on it… he posts about it on twitter every 2 seconds. 

If I was constipated and that turd just wouldn't drop, I'd do what I could to get that turd up outta there.

Same with Rhule, so I get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Denver is a QB away from a deep playoff run - that has been known for a while.  Heck they almost went this past year with Teddy B.  DW and the Falcons is unique - DW wants to go home.  bottom line.  

You put an elite QB on the majority of teams in the NFL and they make a run at the playoffs.  You put a true bad QB on the majority of teams and they won't make it. 

 You think the difference in a horrific QB like Sam and an elite like Watson is only a 3 win difference? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

You put an elite QB on the majority of teams in the NFL and they make a run at the playoffs.  You put a true bad QB on the majority of teams and they won't make it. 

 You think the difference in a horrific QB like Sam and an elite like Watson is only a 3 win difference? 

Huston went to the playoffs once under Watson and lost to the Colts at home. What am I missing here? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

You put an elite QB on the majority of teams in the NFL and they make a run at the playoffs.  You put a true bad QB on the majority of teams and they won't make it. 

 You think the difference in a horrific QB like Sam and an elite like Watson is only a 3 win difference? 

I mean, Watson did lead the Texans to a 4 win season.  Wilson had like 5 wins this year with the Hawks.  Plenty of examples 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

Huston went to the playoffs once under Watson and lost to the Colts at home. What am I missing here? 

that's a different question though. 

Again, pick a random team.  Washington.  You put the worst starting QB in the NFL on that team vs an elite QB.  Is there a signficant difference in outcomes for Washignton? 

Watson went the playoffs in BOTH in first 2 seasons as the full time starter.  Missed his 3rd year.  That's when the front office in Hou went loco.   Think you are missing a lot there.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule is definitely a factor but let’s be honest, why would a athlete choose Charlotte over LA, Tampa, NYC, Atlanta, Denver or Miami? We can’t build a mercenary team because we’re in the same boat as a Tennessee or Buffalo. You have to build your roster and bring in mid range players because these “stars” want to go where the action (Atlanta, LA, NYC), endorsements (LA, NYC) or tax breaks exist (Tampa, Miami). 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know it's only been training camp and one preseason game, but I think T-Mac has already shown his floor to be exactly what I said about him in the pre-draft process. That his floor if he never improves his game, is as one of the best #2 WRs in the NFL, if not even still a low end #1 (i.e. a 25th-ish best WR in the league). I think it's safe to say he's already established himself as our #1, and there are only a small handful of teams in the league where I don't think he'd be their starting #2 WR in Week 1. Bengals (Higgins), Dolphins (Waddle), Eagles (Smith), Bucs (Godwin if healthy), Rams (Adams) are really the only teams where I think he'd be the #3 as a rookie in Week 1.  A few others like the Lions (Williams), Bears (Odunze), Seahawks (Kupp), Commanders (Deebo), where he'd be the 2b to start the season, just because they're vets and/or already have a year or two of experience with their team/QB. And even having said that, I think by year 2, he's better than every one of those players (And no, I'm not saying he's already going to be better than a prime version of Adams, just whatever he'll be at 33 next year), and same goes for Kupp, but that's more because it seems like his body might be quitting on him in a way that hasn't happened to Adams (yet).
    • Well to be fair, Horn not practicing right now to let his stitches heal up from a car accident isn't something that should be concerning.  Sure, you don't want him missing practice leading into the season, but it's one that once healed, won't have lingering affects or fear of re-injuring it, it was just bad luck.
    • Quality backups are absolutely important. This franchise has been plagued with depth problems. That said, there is a little bit of dismay that Mays can't beat out a 1-legged man, and all the talk going into the off-season was how BC would certainly be gone since he had position versatility.  In the end, it doesn't matter too awfully much, as I would be shocked to no end if Corbett makes it through the season. We know what we have in reserve, and that should surely be better than trying to sign random fat guys mid season to try and take over.
×
×
  • Create New...