Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Three top 10 QB's refused to play for Matt Rhule.

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

To add to it, I’m sick of people just bitching about Rhule every chance they get. It’s annoying and counterproductive. We know Zods stance on it… he posts about it on twitter every 2 seconds. 

If I was constipated and that turd just wouldn't drop, I'd do what I could to get that turd up outta there.

Same with Rhule, so I get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Denver is a QB away from a deep playoff run - that has been known for a while.  Heck they almost went this past year with Teddy B.  DW and the Falcons is unique - DW wants to go home.  bottom line.  

You put an elite QB on the majority of teams in the NFL and they make a run at the playoffs.  You put a true bad QB on the majority of teams and they won't make it. 

 You think the difference in a horrific QB like Sam and an elite like Watson is only a 3 win difference? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Actionman0z Veteran

Actionman0z

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CRA said:

You put an elite QB on the majority of teams in the NFL and they make a run at the playoffs.  You put a true bad QB on the majority of teams and they won't make it. 

 You think the difference in a horrific QB like Sam and an elite like Watson is only a 3 win difference? 

Huston went to the playoffs once under Watson and lost to the Colts at home. What am I missing here? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smithers Grand Master

Smithers

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CRA said:

You put an elite QB on the majority of teams in the NFL and they make a run at the playoffs.  You put a true bad QB on the majority of teams and they won't make it. 

 You think the difference in a horrific QB like Sam and an elite like Watson is only a 3 win difference? 

I mean, Watson did lead the Texans to a 4 win season.  Wilson had like 5 wins this year with the Hawks.  Plenty of examples 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

Huston went to the playoffs once under Watson and lost to the Colts at home. What am I missing here? 

that's a different question though. 

Again, pick a random team.  Washington.  You put the worst starting QB in the NFL on that team vs an elite QB.  Is there a signficant difference in outcomes for Washignton? 

Watson went the playoffs in BOTH in first 2 seasons as the full time starter.  Missed his 3rd year.  That's when the front office in Hou went loco.   Think you are missing a lot there.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Riverboat Ron Mentor

Riverboat Ron

Posted
Posted

Rhule is definitely a factor but let’s be honest, why would a athlete choose Charlotte over LA, Tampa, NYC, Atlanta, Denver or Miami? We can’t build a mercenary team because we’re in the same boat as a Tennessee or Buffalo. You have to build your roster and bring in mid range players because these “stars” want to go where the action (Atlanta, LA, NYC), endorsements (LA, NYC) or tax breaks exist (Tampa, Miami). 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Stumpy
      Flux

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Aussie Tank
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By Aussie Tank · Posted

      Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • Jackie Lee
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...