Scouting reports for the top three quarterbacks

[Verge]

Hey guys! I know we have all been focused on quarterbacks this week and I thought I would drop in and throw some quick scouting reports at you. I have been watching a lot of tape on these three guys, and I am pretty impressed by all of them. I don't really buy into the notion that this is an especially weak QB class, I feel like that narrative is pushed out way too much. 

My current QB ranks are: 
1. Willis 
2. Pickett 
3. Corral 

 

Here are my scouting reports (No I do not get paid for clicks): 

https://draftwire.usatoday.com/lists/malik-willis-scouting-report-nfl-draft-liberty-flames-football/

https://draftwire.usatoday.com/lists/kenny-pickett-scouting-report-nfl-draft-pitt-panthers-football/

https://draftwire.usatoday.com/lists/matt-corral-scouting-report-2022-nfl-draft-ole-miss-rebels-football/

Edited March 23, 2022 by Verge

[Jaxel]

I think you forgot to link. But looking forward to the read.

[LinvilleGorge]

I think there are really two reason why this is considered a "weak" class. One, because last year's class was so strong on paper. Two, because there's no slam dunk top prospect in this class. There's no Andrew Luck or Trevor Lawrence who checks all the boxes. There are some good prospects in this class but they all have question marks. Hell, that's a normal class. If you give me a third reason, it's because last year's strong class on paper didn't exactly light the world on fire on the field as rookies.

[MHS831]

[Jon Snow]

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think there are really two reason why this is considered a "weak" class. One, because last year's class was so strong on paper. Two, because there's no slam dunk top prospect in this class. There's no Andrew Luck or Trevor Lawrence who checks all the boxes. There are some good prospects in this class but they all have question marks. Hell, that's a normal class. If you give me a third reason, it's because last year's strong class on paper didn't exactly light the world on fire on the field as rookies.

The hype train for these kids is in full steam. The media and the players agents are earning their money that's for sure. It get clicks and fans dreaming of highlights and championships. 

I just hope our decision makers have tuned that crap out. 

Edited March 23, 2022 by Jon Snow

[Ricky Spanish]

Excuse me but your top 3 list is missing the #1 QB Carson Strong.

JKJK Appreciate everything you contribute Verge, even if we disagree on Willis.

[Verge]

1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Excuse me but your top 3 list is missing the #1 QB Carson Strong.

JKJK Appreciate everything you contribute Verge, even if we disagree on Willis.

I could go on a tangent about Strong but we will save that until I produce his scouting report haha. I do not get peoples fascination for him at all. 

[Ricky Spanish]

Just now, Verge said:

I could go on a tangent about Strong but we will save that until I produce his scouting report haha. I do not get peoples fascination for him at all. 

His name is Strong and he plays QB.

The memes write themselves

[rayzor]

Good write up in all three and I hope you're right about them being better than advertised because it sure seems like we'll end up with one of them.

And I've said from the beginning that Willis is the most interesting prospect to me from this class and I haven't seen anything to dissuade me from that. 

Thanks for sharing it.

[rayzor]

Oh, and thanks for pointing out again why tiny hands matter. He fumbles a lot. 

[thefuzz]

I just do not like Willis' game as much as Corral's...that delivery and release is wild to watch...and at least we know he can stand up to "better defenses".

Corral's arm is LIVE.

[rebelrouser]

Corral--threw a ton of int's two years ago; lots of injuries. Just don't see him as being worth no. 6.

Picket--small hands and a pretty low ceiling not making him worth a no. 6 pick

Willis--too short; hasn't proven he is ready mentally to go through projections; weak competition in an rpo offense; highest ceiling and highest probability to be a complete bust. Not worth no. 6 pick.

 

I would trade back and take a lt w/ first pick and a qb like the kid from UNC with the 2nd round pick obtained in the trade.  

[Verge]

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

Good write up in all three and I hope you're right about them being better than advertised because it sure seems like we'll end up with one of them.

And I've said from the beginning that Willis is the most interesting prospect to me from this class and I haven't seen anything to dissuade me from that. 

Thanks for sharing it.

I was talking about this with @Jared Patterson but if this team really wants one of the top two tackles as I suspect, what would be the best way to guarantee one of them drops to you? You bring the entire front office out to these QB workouts. I think if Ikem or Neal are there, that is who we will pick tbh.

[Verge]

Just now, rayzor said:

Oh, and thanks for pointing out again why tiny hands matter. He fumbles a lot.