Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Neal vs Cross


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

As in they excelled at LT the primary position they were drafted in or that they were still top to serviceable players at new positions like Guard or RT?

Thats tough because some were drafted as guards and some as RT.  Wirfs etc.  But looking at the guys specifically drafted to be LT I dont see an outright unstartable bust

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

I’d appreciate if someone could compound on this answer.

This is from 2019 but it can give you some insight. I would be just fine with LT but the huddle has bought it hook line and sinker we will not draft a bust simply because we have a need and there are so many which is fantasy it can always happen of course.

https://theriotreport.com/bust-alert-choose-wisely-when-drafting-an-offensive-lineman/

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, bobcat91 said:

Then he can battle Moton for RT. The reason he is all over the place is due to lack of lateral movement. Is that what you want in a LT?

I think we disagree on Neal at LT.  I think he plays there day 1 personally.  I think Cross is further along with pass blocking but not run blocking.  Neal is more complete IMO.  

Really high probability that Neal goes before us anyway.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frankw said:

This is from 2019 but it can give you some insight. I would be just fine with LT but the huddle has bought it hook line and sinker we will not draft a bust simply because we have a need and there are so many which is fantasy it can always happen of course.

https://theriotreport.com/bust-alert-choose-wisely-when-drafting-an-offensive-lineman/

Of course it could happen but the odds of a LT busting after being picked in the top 10 (where we are) are infinitely smaller

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, micnificent28 said:

This mock doesn't even have Willis or Pickett in the first round... I would not use this as a reference for anything.

I agree the mock isn't that useful. What is relevant to this discussion is that @ellishas been told that the Panthers like Cross. Now would they take Cross with Neal still on the board? I don't know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

The scary thought is the Panthers falling into that scenario but opting for Pickett. *shudders*

Rhule would say something like "We projected Neal as a late first round G and 2nd round Tackle..." or "Cam Erving is a LT. We like the guys we have..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I have a hard time imagining Ekwonu falling to us. I'd absolutely take him if he did, but that's tough to picture.

If you want a third contestant, that might be Trevor Penning. And yes, there are mocks that have him being taken at six.

I’m with you on this one. Penning is a menace. He’d bring serious attitude and be a tone setter on the OL. He’d have to work on technique and harness the aggression but it would be worth it.

Edited by Prowler2k18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have more faith in XL improving than I do in Tmac being a true number 1 recuever
    • Round 1. TMac arguably the best WR in the draft Round 2. Scour ton mentioned as a possible 1st round edge.     Texas A&M did not use him the same way Purdue did. After the 2023 season he was listed as a first round grade. I believe had Texas A&M used him like they did at Purdue he never makes it out of round 1. Round 3 Princely Umanmielen, we'll go by Princely.  Another highly graded player we got in a lower round. As the video suggests, even if he plays only on passing down it's a positive. Give him a couple of years to develop a he could be a three down player.  Round 4a Etienne IMO a huge upgrade over Blackshear. I can see him in a similar role as CMC without the heavy workload. He can run in between the tackles and has some shifty moves. Give Canales some flexibility. A fellow huddler pointed out UGA running backs don't see the field if they cannot pick up the blitz. Really good pick. Round 4b Ransom a hard hitting safety that has played three different positions on defense. Great pick Round 5a Cam Jackson a massive NT in round 5. I believe a solid rotational pick in a lower round. We added a beast that could make offenses quiver when he's lined up with Brown. Great Value  Round 5b Evans This is another player that can block and has good hands. He also had better seasons before 2024. As a rookie he's probably leaps and bounds better than Ian Thomas. I think he gives us a three headed monster at TE.  Round 6 Horn Jr. Many believe he's just going to be a KR/PR player. I believe there are going to be packages for him to get on the field as a WR. His speed with TMac and Thielen in the slot could be special. I'm really looking forward to seeing him in training camp. I've watched some film and he is very explosive.  Overall I love our picks. I honestly believe all of them will contribute this season. I don't believe we reached on one player in this draft.  This weekend we get a small look at these rookies     
×
×
  • Create New...