Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants open to trade


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Personally, I'd call them to offer this year's #6 and next year's first for their two first rounders this year.

Take a QB and an OL or two top OL and call it a day.

If they’d do that then yes. But why would they do that? Aren’t both of their 1sts top 10? There’s a risk they downgrade…

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

If they’d do that then yes. But why would they do that? Aren’t both of their 1sts top 10? There’s a risk they downgrade…

The report says they're open to trading either of this year's firsts for a first next year. I'm just suggesting an add-on.

I'd also suggest having Dan Morgan be the one that makes the call.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

The report says they're open to trading either of this year's firsts for a first next year.

I'm just suggesting an add-on.

The specific wording says they would trade it for a "package" that includes a first next year. They aren't letting it go for a first alone.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Personally, I'd call them to offer this year's #6 and next year's first for their two first rounders this year.

Take a QB and an OL or two top OL and call it a day.

I'm quite leery of trading future 1st round picks. We have a brutal schedule and a bunch of new coaches and players trying to gel into a team. A top 10 pick in the 2023 draft is well within the range of outcomes for the Panthers with prospects like CJ Stroud for Bryce Young who are considered superior to this year's class by many of the reports I've read.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, frankw said:

The specific wording says they would trade it for a "package" that includes a first next year. They aren't letting it go for a first alone.

What I suggested constitutes a package, but I'd throw in a player like Robby Anderson with no trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, trueblade said:

I'm quite leery of trading future 1st round picks. We have a brutal schedule and a bunch of new coaches and players trying to gel into a team. A top 10 pick in the 2023 draft is well within the range of outcomes for the Panthers with prospects like CJ Stroud for Bryce Young who are considered superior to this year's class by many of the reports I've read.

I think they're taking a quarterback this year.

If they do, I'd like to be able to do so without missing out on one of those linemen.

But also imagine for a moment that they took, say, Charles Cross at five and Tyler Linderbaum at seven. You could then move Bozeman to guard and have as strong a line as any in the league.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Personally, I'd call them to offer this year's #6 and next year's first for their two first rounders this year.

Take a QB and an OL or two top OL and call it a day.


No way we give up next year’s first. It’s a good QB class and we’ll prob need the pick.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tbe said:

No way we give up next year’s first. It’s a good QB class and we’ll prob need the pick.

See above.

If they're set on taking a quarterback this year (and I think they are) then I want a way to also add some help.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

See above.

If they're set on taking a quarterback this year (and I think they are) then I want a way to also add some help.


I get it, but taking a QB this year is a huge gamble with a low chance of success.

Im ok taking Pickles, but we need that #1 pick next year for Cam.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:
Personally, I'd call them to offer this year's #6 and next year's first for their two first rounders this year.

And they would hang up immediately and never do business with you again.

 

6 overall and a 2023 1st rounder is not even close in value to 5 and 7 overall this year. And no Robby Anderson being added would not move the needle whatsoever either.

Edited by t96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Personally, I'd call them to offer this year's #6 and next year's first for their two first rounders this year.

Take a QB and an OL or two top OL and call it a day.

Yeah... no. If I'm Tepper I'm absolutely taking trading next year's 1st off the table for this crew.

 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t go back and look at the espn but there live it definitely said 1 shot 1 goal when it happened. I guess they had not added them yet. Still allowing goals that early is rough. Blue line is a total disaster still. Even with Slavin back. Miller and Nikishin keep making mistakes after mistakes. 
    • I generally disagree with the concept of picking a position because of value early in the draft. For instance, if there's a really good safety, RB or ILB at pick 10, I'm choosing him over a project WR or DE. Better players make the team better. A bunch of ok players will give you an ok team. The number 1 goal of the draft should be to improve the overall talent on the team. Not to fill positions of need.  Deciding beforehand that you're picking a LT in the first or second round because Ickey went down is not the way to improve the team. Now if Dan has similar grades on 2 or 3 players and one happens to be a LT, then yeah go for it. But don't pass on your guy at ILB because you have a gap at LT or need to improve the pass rush with a DE. When those guys don't pan out then you haven't improved your team. But that LB could have been a franchise cornerstone for years to come. See Luke Kuechly and Christian McCaffrey. 
    • Thank God we are inthe NFC South--
×
×
  • Create New...