Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have the Worst odds to make the Playoffs in the NFC


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, t96 said:

If I were a gambler I'd gladly take those odds and hope we hit on a rookie QB. It's ridiculous to have us behind the Giants, Falcons, Lions.

Totally agree. We have a top 5 defense and likely a decent running game with the additions made. Those two functions alone can win a lot of games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok gamblers, help me out here.  Is this saying if I put $1 on the Panthers making the playoffs and they do I'll receive $500?  If that's the case, sign me up for $50.  I'm willing to loose that for the possibility of $25,000 in return.  I think we could easily make the playoffs.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panfanman said:

Ok gamblers, help me out here.  Is this saying if I put $1 on the Panthers making the playoffs and they do I'll receive $500?  If that's the case, sign me up for $50.  I'm willing to loose that for the possibility of $25,000 in return.  I think we could easily make the playoffs.

I believe you bet 100 to win 500.

Conversely, Tampa at -600 means you have to bet 600 to win 100.

Edited by w280sax
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Htarnation4.0 said:

Totally agree. We have a top 5 defense and likely a decent running game with the additions made. Those two functions alone can win a lot of games. 

Cough homers cough. We got smoked by all three of those teams last year minus the lions. And they would have beat us.  The team is trash. And you would lose money. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, t96 said:

If I were a gambler I'd gladly take those odds and hope we hit on a rookie QB. It's ridiculous to have us behind the Giants, Falcons, Lions.


Yeah this is actually good if you’re a panthers fans. Odds don’t mean poo except where Vegas expects people to throw their money. No one outside of the Carolina’s cares about the panthers at this point in time. With the solid additions we’ve made +500 is a nice play. 
 

21 hours ago, panfanman said:

Ok gamblers, help me out here.  Is this saying if I put $1 on the Panthers making the playoffs and they do I'll receive $500?  If that's the case, sign me up for $50.  I'm willing to loose that for the possibility of $25,000 in return.  I think we could easily make the playoffs.


When you see +500, basically move the decimal point over two numbers, so you have 5.00. Basically $1 wagered equals $5 won. So 5x your bet.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? Wow. Sorry. Got my timeline messed up. I remember someone claiming to be Graham’s mom on the old Charlotte.com board so I guess it was a long time ago that he was here. I guess I thought he was after Kasay. 
    • Nick Scott has gotten his share of Huddle hate, but I came across this SI article by Zach Roberts when I was researching recently released Quandre Diggs, speculated to be a better option  (https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/11/07/breaking-titans-cut-former-three-time-pro-bowler-quandre-diggs-4-destinations-ranked/3/), but getting back to Nick Scott... Now to be fair, the observation on Scott was before the Packers game, but the stats couldn't have changed that much, and may have gotten better.   "At some point during virtually every Carolina Panthers game, you have probably found yourself grumbling about Nick Scott. The much-maligned safety has seemingly been out of position a lot or has failed to make a play. The eye test has often let him down. "But that's why stats are so helpful. Sometimes, the eye test, especially for fans, is unreliable. On occasion, advanced metrics help make sense of things and lend more clarity. In the case of Scott, they make him look like a much better safety than any of us would've guessed. "In coverage, Scott has given up just 15 yards and an average of five yards per catch. That's the lowest among safeties, leading superstars like Julian Love, Talanoa Hafunga, Quandre Diggs, Kerby Joseph, Kyle Hamilton, and Minkah Fitzpatrick. "In FI%, the safety leads all his counterparts once again at 40%. Brian Branch, Camren Kinchens, and Xavier McKinney are some notable names he leads. He's been pretty excellent in pass coverage, which is crucial for the Panthers." For those wondering, "FI" means forced incompletions. Now I'm way past trying to figure out why X links aren't embedding for me like they used to, but here you go: https://x.com/dacornerman/status/1981363757608513632?t=rx_5iLjp8_y5huNcg_y1nA&s=19   Suffice it to say that Scott may not be as bad as some have led on.    https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/onsi/news/much-maligned-panthers-db-way-better-than-think      
    • Nah it was Graham. I remember watching it live.
×
×
  • Create New...