Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brady leaving Tampa???


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, joemac said:

Absolutely retarded.  Why would any of the parties involved do this?  Miami I guess I could see WANTING Brady, who doesnt, but why in the world would Brady or Tampa do this?

Miami has a really good defense. They just got the best WR in football.  Gronkowski hasn’t confirmed he’s coming back yet.  Sticking it to Bellichick in the division?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe TB had already made plans moving on from Tom… maybe they know it’s his last season for sure so they’re looking to take advantage of it and get something for him in return? 
 

Still just another bug I wish we could stomp but we’re stuck with ghost seeing Darnold, sigh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Fright said:

Maybe TB had already made plans moving on from Tom… maybe they know it’s his last season for sure so they’re looking to take advantage of it and get something for him in return? 
 

Still just another bug I wish we could stomp but we’re stuck with ghost seeing Darnold, sigh. 

I mean, I guess.....if Tampa was high on Tua or something, but then that kinda leaves Miami, who will undoubtedly trade away a poo ton of assets for Brady, high and dry next season or the one after when Brady DOES actually hang it up for good.  IMO its just an absurd proposition all the way around. Especially considering Tampa is making a bunch of moves to get pieces Brady wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...