Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

updated NFL unit grades for all teams


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Thats extremely genrous to give us the 30th best QB situations, over Mariota in Atlanta and Drew Locke in Seattle.


Edit: and for all the poo we give buffalo for taking our players they sure as hell know to stay away from paying running backs and look where that has them.

Edited by thunderraiden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

per Mike Clay.  Was hoping our OL would be higher with the two recent signings.

 

 

Well, I think we got a little too excited about signings that were absolutely improvements but not exactly Pro Bowl/All Pro caliber players. More like we upgrade a couple of spots closer to NFL average. 

Remember improvement doesn't mean we are going to be good, just better.

Which....I am fine with better. If both of our signings are just better, it's at least a starting point. Last offseason was making it worse.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Don't be surprised if our defense takes a step back next season. Losing some starters and the pass rush threat of Reddick is going to be a bigger issue than some realize. 

Chinn, Horn, but more importantly Burns and Brown need to become the all-pro types we’ve been hoping for. Those four actually taking leadership roles would come a long way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll just wait and see. It's hard to predict rankings at this point in the process. Like is customary, we really won't know what type of team we have until some time in October.

If we're rolling with Darnold, we'll probably suck though. That's about as much as I can halfway commit to at this point.

I will keep overall expectations pretty low though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...