Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule dresses like a goddamn slob


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

Gameday attire is generally provided by the NFL. There was a discussion of this a while back when some coaches wanted to wear suits (still wish the NFL allowed that, honestly).

But to be perfectly honest, if he were a great head coach I wouldn't give a sh-t if he dressed like a junior high phys-ed teacher.

Given who he is though, I wouldn't like him any better if he were the best dressed man in the world.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

I think its too far to go at him about stuff like this. Sure he hasn't had a good two years but this and attacking his character seems a bit much. He's still a person, probably a good one. NFL is hard.

I don't know what kind of person he is.

I just know he's not good enough to coach in the NFL.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

I think its too far to go at him about stuff like this. Sure he hasn't had a good two years but this and attacking his character seems a bit much. He's still a person, probably a good one. NFL is hard.

There are pictures of him without his shoes tied at one of the QBs’ pro days …there is zero excuse for a man to have that happen

this scene from Bull Durham is perfect for Rhule   If you are a winner, you are colorful.    if you are a loser, you are a slob

 

https://youtu.be/NY1UbVXzhZE

Slob

 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

He chooses what he wears and how he conducts himself. Also not much evidence to support your second point.

Bailing on 2 college teams after committing, throwing players and coaches under the bus, telling our locker room he could make more money going back to college. Seems like a great guy

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...