Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most teams lose because they don't know why they lost.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

No, we have a drunk driver behind the wheel of an old K car with a blown head gasket and no headlights.

You cannot trust this car, nor the driver any longer...but sure, let's put another couple thousand in her and see if we can squeeze out another 28 miles. 

giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47mf78fvghdzgjql5e6m

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still baffled how the offense only looks damn near untouchable on its first series. I know the plays are scripted but smdh. 

Same for the Defense. Not nearly as bad as their counterparts though. Iirc we went the whole season without a TD scored on our D during the first drive. 

Most teams lose because they dont know why they lost...No I think we all know why we lost..I'd like to know if we still don't practice redzone drills and who thought that was a bright idea. Really hope we've since changed that. 

On another note: Our oline was soft. Our WR's had issues focusing. Our QB had happy feet which overtime increased his dropbacks speed throwing the whole offense out of sync. Our Defense is passable but they stayed on the field too long. We sacrificed power for speed. 

Keep it simple: We got outmatched physically and outcoached mentally. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ColumbusCounty said:

Still baffled how the offense only looks damn near untouchable on its first series. I know the plays are scripted but smdh. 

Same for the Defense. Not nearly as bad as their counterparts though. Iirc we went the whole season without a TD scored on our D during the first drive. 

Adjustments... or basically coaching.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Pretty sure no fan or journalist knows more about a team than the staff. Teams know why they lost.

It’s the teams who are consistent winners who know why they lost and fix the problems. Panthers haven’t been that team since year one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...