Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

big Saints / Eagles trade


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

As much as I can't stand the Saints they have been a pretty well run organization and pretty crafty for a number of years now even after their moron head hunting bounty defensive coordinator and their recent retired pill head coach being a very solid coach but a pill head puke. They have more plans and it's probably to try to cram it down the NFC Souths throats. Even when they suck these days they are still competitive. They lose one of the best QB's to ever play and they still look decent in a down year. It just baffles me sometimes when it come stop the Taints. I can't stand them at all but must admit how well run and coached they always seem to be.

 

 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Growl said:

if we just wait nine more seasons the roster will be fully prepared to take a can’t miss Quarterback prospect, play it safe and draft hog mollies and let’s go dominate some TOP

But all the QB's this year seem flawed as heck in some way shape or form. I would be all about drafting one of these guys if we had a second but the 6th overall pick seems like such a reach. I'm no expert obviously but just my opinion.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, YourLastThought said:

But all the QB's this year seem flawed as heck in some way shape or form. I would be all about drafting one of these guys if we had a second but the 6th overall pick seems like such a reach. I'm no expert obviously but just my opinion.

the panthers will never get the kind of quarterback prospect you want them to wait for

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, YourLastThought said:

But all the QB's this year seem flawed as heck in some way shape or form. I would be all about drafting one of these guys if we had a second but the 6th overall pick seems like such a reach. I'm no expert obviously but just my opinion.

It’s a crapshoot. Exact same things were said about Mahomes, Allen, Herbert, etc

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

the panthers will never get the kind of quarterback prospect you want them to wait for

So youre saying draft a guy now and develop him basically? Work with him and fix his flaws and grow him up? Of so I think that's a great idea and am behind it but unfortunately I have no faith in our coaches ability to develop a QB. If we had a different coach I would be totally on board with that. I wish we had hired a coach who was a known QB developer instead of Rhule but that's a different story I guess. I do see where you are coming from and definitely agree with your logic when you break it down that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

But all the QB's this year seem flawed as heck in some way shape or form. I would be all about drafting one of these guys if we had a second but the 6th overall pick seems like such a reach. I'm no expert obviously but just my opinion.

I honestly think this isn't all that accurate and a lot of it is because there isn't a slam dunk top prospect among them and this class is right on the heels of last year's very strong on paper class. I mean, folks... the reality is that Trevor Lawrence and Andrew Luck type prospects are a rarity. That's why they're considered "once in a decade" type prospects. IMO, this is a fairly typical QB class. Some good, but not perfect on paper prospects.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I honestly think this isn't all that accurate and a lot of it is because there isn't a slam dunk top prospect among them and this class is right on the heels of last year's very strong on paper class. I mean, folks... the reality is that Trevor Lawrence and Andrew Luck type prospects are a rarity. That's why they're considered "once in a decade" type prospects. IMO, this is a fairly typical QB class. Some good, but not perfect on paper prospects.

Who would you take. I see what you are saying but if you take a QB which one would you go with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saints really devaluing next years picks for this year with a 1st year HC. 

Bold Strategy Reaction GIF by MOODMAN

They are built to win now but they need a QB. Willis won't be ready this year and I would love to play Picket twice a year. Maybe Corral. I would think they are getting ready to make a trade for one instead but boy do I hope they draft one. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now, XL is probably outside the top 100 NFL WR's. That is just not going to cut it.  He certainly could turn it around but our track record in this area is very well established. When our WR's bust, boy do they bust. XL looks exactly like so many of those cases.  XL has been the 9th most productive WR in that 2024 class and is likely to slip to 10th very soon as one of the guys who missed a large chunk of last season is about to pass him(Pearsall) in career production. That's not great for the 7th overall WR picked. It's a disappointment, without question. Even a the guy getting healthy scratches has still outperformed him so far.  And, for the record, it was a very, very productive WR class so far.
    • 4th read? On a playaction? Do you not watch the ALL 22? There were 4 receivers on that play. Only 2 went beyond 2 yards on a 10 yard crossing route in front of a single high safety. The TE stayed in to block before releasing on a drag route and was never a read. Coker was motioned to the right to pull a defender to the sideline. This was a clear flat route and hot if the defender came on a blitz. The RB stayed in to block on the right side. Coming out of the playaction Bryce spots the defender for a possible blitz and then goes to his primary receiver on his left. The only receiver on the left coming out of the playaction was TMac. He clearly follows TMac to the cross in front of the safety and looks off the safety to the left. This is not a read to XL. It's looking off the safety. He swings his vision back to his primary in TMac and throws the ball to the numbers (20) 10 yards over the head of the DB when TMac reaches the right hashes near the 30 yard line before TMac even makes a cut. Bryce was never leading or throwing to the receiver. He was throwing to a spot based on the movement of 2 defenders. It was up to TMac to make this play happen with perfect timing, release, sell and cut on his route. Give credit to the play design. The defense is playing that route as a sideline route and TMac makes it happen with his body position and control as he cuts/drifts 10 yards up field to the spot he knew it was going to before the play. If that were a 4th progression read out of a playaction, you'd see 4 hitch steps and the receiver would have been led to the sideline as TMac would have never known the ball was going to be thrown 10 yards over the DBs head on a 10 yard cross to the sideline. You can also tell this is the desgin as Bryce sets to the left out of the playaction with XL on his right before the cross. Then he takes 3 bounce steps to move with the pocket as XL is late to the cross. His first hitch step is to the right after TMac crosses, which is followed by an immediate throw before a cut is made by TMac. TMac was the only receiver to the left on Bryce's set, and he was one of 2 WRs to the right on Bryce's first and only hitch step. Give TMac and the play design a bulk of the credit. Bryce did well, but he didn't sell the playaction or a possible pass to XL very well. He did do very well at throwing to a predetermined spot on the field after TMac set up that crossing route perfectly with XL and Sanders both late on developing their routes. Did you catch all that on the play? For some reason, you think there were 4 progressions out of play action with the defense pressing, Bryce setting his hips to the left with all 3 receivers on the right side of what you think was his 4th option as the only receiver on the left at the snap, and only 1 hitch step to the right after TMac waits for XL to cross left. Why would you think a QB would set their hips to the left when their first 3 progressions are on the right side of the field?
    • Agreed, however there are many QBs that don't place it perfectly.  
×
×
  • Create New...