Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robby Anderson wants Panthers to work out Colin Kaepernick


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd be okay with moving Robby for whatever we could get. There are players in the NFL who have the clout to put pressure on their team to make certain moves. Robby Anderson isn't even close to being one. 

Sounds to me he's asking to be traded.  Traded his ass for a 3rd this year and don't look back.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

His final year he had 16td, 4 INT and a 90.7 Rating.

We're currently trotting out the worst QB over the last 4 years out at say one starter.

Let's be reality about how bad the panthers situation in. 

He did it coming off of injuries with Jeremy Kerley as his top target. His 2nd receiver was so bad he never played another game in the league. His head coach never coached again in the NFL. His offensive coordinator took a demotion back to position coach. They tried playing Gabbert and it was a train wreck. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, shaq said:

Either we get rid of Darnold or Robby. One of your starting WR can’t just disrespect your potential starting QB publicly endlessly. 

I think parting with both is the better option.  I’d rather rep someone else at WR than Robby.  Maybe TMJ is or isn’t the answer….but I still wish we never paid Robbie and let him walk.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I think parting with both is the better option.  I’d rather rep someone else at WR than Robby.  Maybe TMJ is or isn’t the answer….but I still wish we never paid Robbie and let him walk.  

Drafting TMJ in the 2nd was a clear message that we were planning to do just that... then we re-signed him and I'm like... then why in the FUG did we just draft a WR in the 2nd with an entire laundry list of roster needs????

This team's management is just baffling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...