Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy Fowler: Panthers have done their due diligence on QB Jimmy Garoppolo


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, KillerKat said:

Qbs that suck don't go to a Super Bowl and another Conference Championship. They just don't no matter what team they're on. Yeah you can say his recent injury is something to stay away from, but to say he has sucked is inaccurate at best.

Go look at his playoff stats and get back to me. He sucks. He's been on some damn good teams.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KillerKat said:

Qbs that suck don't go to a Super Bowl and another Conference Championship. They just don't no matter what team they're on. Yeah you can say his recent injury is something to stay away from, but to say he has sucked is inaccurate at best.

What about QBs that the franchise give up 3 first round picks to trade up and draft their replacement because they know QB is the biggest weakness on the roster and then put them on the trade block in which there id little interest from other teams? 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope the Panthers have learned their lessons and will stop obtaining  rejected  and retreaded quarterbacks that other teams don't want.

However,based on some of the poor decisions they have made in the past, it scares me that they not have.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KillerKat said:

Qbs that suck don't go to a Super Bowl and another Conference Championship. They just don't no matter what team they're on. Yeah you can say his recent injury is something to stay away from, but to say he has sucked is inaccurate at best.

Sure they do.  Nick foles, Jared Goff, Colin kaepernick, Rex grossman just in the last 15 years. The 49ers have made an art of taking bad qbs deep into the playoffs these past 10 years or so

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bring it 💥💯

49'ers:

2015 > 5-11

2016 > 2-14

2017 > 1-10 w/o Jimmy G.

2018 > 3-10 w/o Jimmy G.

2020 > 3-7 w/o Jimmy G.

'17/'18/'20 > 7-27 (.206) w/o Jimmy G.

'17/'18/'20 > 9-6 (.600) w/ Jimmy G.

'19/'21 > 27-12 (.692) w/ Jimmy G. fully available, includes a Super Bowl and 2 NFC Championship games, as well as multiple playoff wins against Whiny Aaron.

Jimmy G. is the epitome of a difference maker...

...the anti-Darnold if you will -- Panthers could use a some of that 👊🏆

  •  
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If Jimmy G was such a difference maker then why were the Niners willing to mortgage their entire franchise on a huge trade up to go get a non-D1 QB in the draft?

 

You are talking to Sizzle who says there is no way Watson forces a trade, Wilson won’t get traded, and Rodgers won’t get his way. He is either a troll account or has the absolute worst takes I’ve ever seen. He also thinks Tepper is a great owner… *insert emojis* 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

You are talking to Sizzle who says there is no way Watson forces a trade, Wilson won’t get traded, and Rodgers won’t get his way. He is either a troll account or has the absolute worst takes I’ve ever seen. He also thinks Tepper is a great owner… *insert emojis* 

Oh, the guy is comically wrong about virtually everything but it doesn't dampen his enthusiasm and willingness to double down. Hell, he should go down and try to get a job in the Panthers' front office. He's fit right in.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers need to draft a QB in the first round! This negligence from this franchise regarding the Qb position since January 2020 needs to stop and quit reaching for bad retreaded so called bridge Qb's that they have swung and missed on two years now and they don't need to to it yet again! Also the narrative needs to stop about oh this isnt a good Qb class how do we or the so called experts know its not a slam dunk guarantee this class is not the greatest!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...