Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 2-3 predictions. Do the Panthers get a pick,?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Billy Goat said:

If we’re talking purely draft picks it’s probably going to take a 2023 2nd, 3rd and a 2022 4th or 5th to move into the back end of the second round/top of the third round. That’s way too much for one of these QBs when they could probably get Mayfield for a 2022 4th or 5th.

This draft doesn’t have that kind of value.  The charts are great but this is a buyers’ market.  Much more fluid than years past.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) We don’t have much to offer. Would have to offer a player + pick at this point I’d think

2) The teams at the top of round 2 don’t have multiples in 2 so they’d be dropping out of the 2nd completely 

Don’t get me wrong I really want them to draft a QB because we know the alternative route and it’s not good (I’m not talking Sam). I just don’t know what it’s going to take to move up. Are the Vikes so CB starved that they’ll take Henderson over drafting a guy like Booth?

Tampa needs a DT but we aren’t flipping them Brown of all teams. 

GB/NE both make sense for Robby but I don’t think any of the 4 QB’s last that long

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, year of the snitch said:

I think we can stay put and still land Howell or Ridder.

I don't see that many teams wanting to use a 2nd or 3rd on them, just to play them as a back up.

We actually might start one of these dudes.

I agree. Think some of these guys are in for longer nights than many anticipate. At least I hope. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, davos said:

Pretty convinced we’re trading up. 

Ridder, Howell or Corral. Malik may go too soon/the capital would be too much.

Fitterer said there were multiple (more than 1, but not sure how many) QBs with "first round grades."  Since I doubt they expected to have Willis, Corral, and Howell available in round 2, I expect them to do what it takes to move up to get one--he would not be doing his job if they ignored first-round-graded QBs in round 2. 

Not having the 38th pick overall--another way Darnold is sticking it to us.

I am guessing that the Panthers are either going to trade away a player (YGM, Brown, BC, Elf, Haynes, etc), their 4th rounder, and maybe a 2023 second rounder (Forget what Fitterer said; these are unusual circumstances if the Panthers really have first-round grades) to get to the middle of the second round.  Heck, if we came away with a LT and potential starting QB and nothing else, I would be elated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

is there a reason we are not talking about Yetur being a possible trade candidate? If the team loves a QB thats avialable... Yetur plus a 5th would most likely get you a 2nd round pick in this draft.

We would have almost no pass rushing depth if Yetur was traded. Also, I don't think it's smart to trade players mid development. Sometimes it takes a while for defensive lineman to really develop. Mario Addison took years, as did Charles Johnson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

We would have almost no pass rushing depth if Yetur was traded. Also, I don't think it's smart to trade players mid development. Sometimes it takes a while for defensive lineman to really develop. Mario Addison took years, as did Charles Johnson.

So you are saying we shouldnt take a DE who is in mid-development, and trade him for an early pick to grab a potential starting QB?

Note: Yetur is a free agent season after next, and BB is due a big pay day....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

So you are saying we shouldnt take a DE who is in mid-development, and trade him for an early pick to grab a potential starting QB?

Note: Yetur is a free agent season after next, and BB is due a big pay day....

I'm saying I wouldn't trade a player that plays a premium position that we have little depth at.

I would trade Robby Anderson first, or a cornerback, or even Christian McCaffrey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Care to elaborate why you disagree? We kicked the ball off 3 times and we kept the Browns to starting field position of the 22, 27, and 10 (would have been 21 before a penalty). All 3 of those are successes with the modern kickoff rule.
    • Its August so obviously quality options are not there. The question is whether any improvement can be made to the bottom of the depth chart.
    • NFL has a huge amount of parity.  The talent level between most NFL starters outside of the top 5 to 10 guys at a position is very comparable.  2020 worst teams Jacksonville Jaguars - 1-15 (worst record in NFL) New York Jets - 2-14 Cincinnati Bengals - 4-11-1 Atlanta Falcons - 4-12 Houston Texans - 4-12 Carolina Panthers - 5-11 Detroit Lions - 5-11 Philadelphia Eagles - 4-11-1 Los Angeles Chargers - 7-9 Denver Broncos - 5-11 2024 Worst teams New York Giants - 3-14 (tied for worst) Cleveland Browns - 3-14 (tied for worst) Tennessee Titans - 3-14 (tied for worst) New England Patriots - 4-13 Carolina Panthers - 5-12 Jacksonville Jaguars - 4-13 Las Vegas Raiders - 4-13 New York Jets - 5-12 Chicago Bears - 5-12 Arizona Cardinals - 8-9 Bengals, Texans, Lions, Eagles, Broncos and the Jags have all made the the playoffs in the last 3 years. What I'm saying is it's stupid to argue when team is the worst when there is so much parity and the system allows quick turnarounds.    
×
×
  • Create New...