Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers likely drafting a QB


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I'd like to know how they plan to get into the 2nd. 

Every pick with have in this draft would get us about half way in value per the chart to the top of the 2nd round.   

giving up a player like Robby Anderson or trading away a pick next year. I really hope it's not the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stbugs said:

SMH. I don’t know why you guys are so optimistic about this. With pick 137 as our best pick, a QB in the 2nd basically means we lose our 2023 draft pick and that should be a non-starter. There’s an almost certainty that the QB we could get with next year’s first is a better talent than a QB we trade it for this year.

This. If it's pick 137 and we don't give up next year's pick to move up by all means draft a QB but I really don't want to lose more draft picks next year. If they would take Robbie Anderson to move up in this draft I would be interested but nobody is taking him for a second and I won't even start day dreaming on something impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Look at the trades yesterday. The trade ups largely haven't been super costly. We're not trading our 1st next year. I could see something like Robbie and a mid-rounder given the run on WRs yesterday and some good teams still borderline desperate at WR.

I would consider trading Robbie and a mid rounder to move up for Sam Howell or maybe even Carson Strong possibly but I don't think anybody really wants or cares about Robbie Anderson after his bad season last year unfortunately.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I know they weren’t but they all still involved a 1st rounder as part of them except for one that went two spots. We would be trading down to 33-45 from 137 and then just have 5ths+. That’s a way bigger jump than any of the other trades.

If you could trade Robby and a team values him then that’s great. I’m not that optimistic that he has that value. I’m solely talking about trading picks. That’s where if we need to move to the top of the 2nd then I think we’d have to use our 1st next year or our 2nd next year plus a few mid rounders.

I don't think we can make the move without a player being involved and Robby would be my bet.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

I would consider trading Robbie and a mid rounder to move up for Sam Howell or maybe even Carson Strong possibly but I don't think anybody really wants or cares about Robbie Anderson after his bad season last year unfortunately.

That's what I thought too but given that crazy run on WRs yesterday and multiple major trades for vet WRs I think he my have more value than I would've thought. There are still contenders like GB and KC who are borderline desperate at WR.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's what I thought too but given that crazy run on WRs yesterday and multiple major trades for vet WRs I think he my have more value than I would've thought. There are still contenders like GB and KC who are borderline desperate at WR.

Have to think if you're Green Bay, you need to help Rogers out, so should you really gamble on tier 2-3 in the WR class that's already had 7 go?  Robbie would give them a known commodity and they do have (2) 2nds.  It's an interesting destination for sure.  Send him to Brown County Wisconsin.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davos said:

Have to think if you're Green Bay, you need to help Rogers out, so should you really gamble on tier 2-3 in the WR class that's already had 7 go?  Robbie would give them a known commodity and they do have (2) 2nds.  It's an interesting destination for sure.  Send him to Brown County Wisconsin.

It makes sense to me for both sides if the right QB prospect is still available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, stbugs said:

SMH. I don’t know why you guys are so optimistic about this. With pick 137 as our best pick, a QB in the 2nd basically means we lose our 2023 draft pick and that should be a non-starter. There’s an almost certainty that the QB we could get with next year’s first is a better talent than a QB we trade it for this year.

could be a player

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, davos said:

Have to think if you're Green Bay, you need to help Rogers out, so should you really gamble on tier 2-3 in the WR class that's already had 7 go?  Robbie would give them a known commodity and they do have (2) 2nds.  It's an interesting destination for sure.  Send him to Brown County Wisconsin.

 Best scenario at the moment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It makes sense to me for both sides if the right QB prospect is still available.

Right? I'm pretty darn confident we've got a top-12 line (playoff caliber) for him, better than he's ever had.  And with CMC (knock on wood) & DJ at his disposal, could make him feel like he's playing with Dynami and Javonte again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
    • Look at what the Bears have done with Caleb Williams, drafting playmaking WR's and TE's and making it easier for him to operate the offense. Conception is perfect for what the offense needs (speed and someone who can make defenders miss) and as today, April 11th, I think he's the pick @19 
×
×
  • Create New...