Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

James Bradberry


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I thought he was a strong zone CB? Maybe I am completely getting that wrong.

Looked it up and it said he was strong in zone schemes and bad in man. Giants stuff

🤷‍♂️ you could be right, but although we ran a zone scheme under Ron, we drafted him to lock up the bigger receivers in our division like Evans, Julio, and Michael Thomas, which is what he did really well when manned up on them.

With the Giants, maybe his struggles in man may be due to him losing a step or maybe he was dealing with injuries?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

🤷‍♂️ you could be right, but although we ran a zone scheme under Ron, we drafted him to lock up the bigger receivers in our division like Evans, Julio, and Michael Thomas, which is what he did really well when manned up on them.

With the Giants, maybe his struggles in man may be due to him losing a step or maybe he was dealing with injuries?

He was like Norman (his one year), zone CB that locked up good WRs. Kind of looked like man but he just didn't have the speed for true man play. Was true for both when their new teams went the other way to hard. 

He is still only 28. If you play heavy zone he is a great CB to have. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

He was like Norman (his one year), zone CB that locked up good WRs. Kind of looked like man but he just didn't have the speed for true man play. Was true for both when their new teams went the other way to hard. 

He is still only 28. If you play heavy zone he is a great CB to have. 

Good points...  it could've been primarily zone.  I just know he mirrored the #1s in our division, and from memory, it often appeared he ran with them for the entirety of their routes...  and i could've swore we drafted him to play more man.  At least thats how i remember it.  But, I know we ran a zone heavy scheme.  

I'll go with your take though.  Either way, I don't think it's gonna be relevant to us.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Good points...  it could've been primarily zone.  I just know he mirrored the #1s in our division, and from memory, it often appeared he ran with them for the entirety of their routes...  and i could've swore we drafted him to play more man.  At least thats how i remember it.  But, I know we ran a zone heavy scheme.  

I'll go with your take though.  Either way, I don't think it's gonna be relevant to us.

They both ran with the good WRs, they just had a safety over top and they were under. Without that safety and the other team can just make it a speed thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
    • Sounds like Veesaar is entering the draft. He could always test the waters and pull out and return but without him our big men look like a serious liability. Better do something in the portal. If they don't do something about this portal madness my days as a college sports fan are probably numbered. This bullshit of having a nearly entirely new team every season is gonna get old fast.
×
×
  • Create New...