Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cade Mays


ellis
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, stbugs said:

Yep, that’s why I almost expect him to get passed by in the LG sweepstakes. I also don’t see Brown in the game. It would shock me if he’s in NFL playing shape.

Yea, I agree.

Brown will likely have an uphill battle to get, and stay on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Wherever they put him on the oline I hope it's Campen who makes that call.

this. rhule needs to keep his greasy opinions on personnel to himself and let the guys who know what they are talking about make the call.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/15/2022 at 12:22 PM, KillerKat said:

Makes me more infuriated how we took a fuging long snapper over just keeping it simple and drafting an o-lineman like Trey Smith. I can never forgive Rhule for that. It wasn't that hard. It was an obvious choice that could've helped the team. Last year and this year shows that we give Rhule control over late rounds and some UDFAs. 

This seems like a pretty nonsensical take unless you have some data supporting it. In what world is the coach the one wanting to draft a long snapper? The rationale for drafting a long snapper is to cut costs at a position that is not valued. That's definitely a big picture GM type move. Doesn't even make sense that a coach would micromanage a long snapper decision but if so, would almost certainly prefer the solid reliable vet. There's no benefit for a coach to take a worse unproven player. Coaches reluctantly accept moves that make their team worse in the short term; they don't pound the table demanding them. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/16/2022 at 6:11 PM, stbugs said:

Yep, that’s why I almost expect him to get passed by in the LG sweepstakes. I also don’t see Brown in the game. It would shock me if he’s in NFL playing shape.

bugs, you got to be feeling this OL, right? Im talking soup to nuts, talent, depth, youth, coach, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
On 5/15/2022 at 12:22 PM, KillerKat said:

Makes me more infuriated how we took a fuging long snapper over just keeping it simple and drafting an o-lineman like Trey Smith. I can never forgive Rhule for that. It wasn't that hard. It was an obvious choice that could've helped the team. Last year and this year shows that we give Rhule control over late rounds and some UDFAs. 

I understand the pick. JJ has now been in the league for 14 years; that is a long time even for a long snapper. They probably weren't sure if he was going to retire or not and didn't want any Jordan Gross surprises. He's now signed for 1 year so we'll see where this goes. With all the kickers we went through last year it's a very good thing he was still here. Fletcher is still with us but hopefully JJ avoids injury.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/15/2022 at 12:05 PM, Icege said:

I think Mays makes the roster, though he might not be a part of the starting group (my prediction there is Ekwonu, Christensen, Bozeman, Corbett, and Moton).

Now pick 3 to 4 players from below and we've got our OL group:

  • Deonte Brown
  • Dennis Daley
  • Michael Jordan
  • Pat Elflein
  • Cameron Erving
  • Mike Horton
  • Sam Tecklenburg
  • Austen Pleasants

tbh I'd be okay with just taking Brown and two traffic cones at this point

I agree that the starting group is Ekwonu, Christensen, Bozeman, Corbett, and Moton. 

Elfein and Erving stay because we already paid them, and they are serviceable vet BACK UPS.

Mays seems like a no brainer; plays C, RG, and RT. That's a good guy to have on the team. Especially with Erving and Elfein gone next season.

Brown and Jordan are young, cheap guards that have showed promise. The staff seem higher on Jordan than most of us, but he is a 24 yo 4th rounder out of Ohio State, So I'm not writing him off as depth. That would be 10, and we could get away with keeping 9 this year I think, due to the versatility of the back ups/Christensen. Trying to stash either on the PS squad could be a risk though, so we'll see.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/15/2022 at 10:42 PM, NYPantherFan said:

Give me that starting 5 with Mays, Elflein and Irving. Brown and Daley can battle it out for the last spot.

Jordan can get cut the first day of camp for all I care.

100% on your top 8. Fug Daley though, he's had his shot, time to move on. I'd rather sign Jon Daley.

John Daly, the broken golfer who returned to the circuit and surprised  everyone with his striking appearance - News Rebeat

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/16/2022 at 6:09 PM, stbugs said:

Not really. They said he was a 2nd round G or a 3rd round T. Seeing as how any T with the same grade as a G will go a round earlier, we were basically saying he’s a great G prospect as the top Gs go late 1st or 2nd. Top tackle prospects go top 15.

Rhule was basically saying we got him in the 3rd as a T but that they got a steal as he would have gone 2nd if he was a G.

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2021/05/28/panthers-matt-rhule-calls-brady-christensen-third-round-tackle-second-round-guard/

Yeah, this is a while back but I remember the video. Pretty sure I meant to say disagrees. Not sure what happened there.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see both sides of the arguments, but compared to last year we're somehow at an upgrade over completely fried Dalton and wasn't even good in college Plummer. At least Pickett and Grier probably have some desire to make more money when Dalton was happy to just go through the motions and I will never understand why they even bothered with Plummer. 
    • After watching Dan for 3 yrs now, I think I understand his plan. It’s a simple plan that should work for the long run.     I saw some of this last yr. Dan wants a vet and a young player at each position. I really think we go OT if one they like there. Moton is aging, Icky will not be back until 27, if ever. We need to get ahead of the tackle problem 
    • You are just stressing too much about these particular positions. You want to upgrade from Bryce and I understand that but you aren’t going to really get that without getting into a bidding war for a QB2 potential QB1 like Willis. You could possibly trade for Mills or the backup for Chicago but they are still gambles and their teams will won’t decent picks.  Again the Eagles thought KP was a capable enough backup to trade for him once their backup was hurt and won a Super Bowl with him as QB2. The point is most teams aren’t rolling with some stud QB2/3 that is going to push even a bottom tier starter. They are better off the building their roster in other areas. The Rams are rolling with Bennett right now as QB2 for example.  The goal is winning absolutely. We overachieved last year even with stumbling into the playoffs. Another year and this staff needs to take the next step in building a team. Will Grier has little to no impact on that….
×
×
  • Create New...