Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Steve Reed reports "the Panthers are still interested in" Jimmy Garoppolo


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

To quote the inimitable Sgt. Joe Friday...

..."just the facts, ma'am"... 😎👊

2015 > 5-11

2016 > 2-14

2017 > 1-10 w/o Jimmy G.

2018 > 3-10 w/o Jimmy G.

2020 > 3-7 w/o Jimmy G.

'17/'18/'20 > 7-27 (.206) w/o Jimmy G.

'17/'18/'20 > 9-6 (.600) w/ Jimmy G.

'19/'21 > 27-12 (.692) w/ Jimmy G. fully available, includes a Super Bowl and 2 NFC Championship games, as well as multiple playoff wins against Whiny Aaron.

Jimmy G. is the epitome of a difference maker...

...the anti-Darnold if you will -- Panthers could use a some of that 💥👊...

Los Angeles Rams Reaction GIF by Red Bull

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

To quote the inimitable Sgt. Joe Friday...

..."just the facts, ma'am"... 😎👊

2015 > 5-11

2016 > 2-14

2017 > 1-10 w/o Jimmy G.

2018 > 3-10 w/o Jimmy G.

2020 > 3-7 w/o Jimmy G.

'17/'18/'20 > 7-27 (.206) w/o Jimmy G.

'17/'18/'20 > 9-6 (.600) w/ Jimmy G.

'19/'21 > 27-12 (.692) w/ Jimmy G. fully available, includes a Super Bowl and 2 NFC Championship games, as well as multiple playoff wins against Whiny Aaron.

Jimmy G. is the epitome of a difference maker...

...the anti-Darnold if you will -- Panthers could use a some of that 💣💥...

Lol, it’s bad enough that you can’t display critical thinking to just post WINZ WINZ WINZ like it’s literally only the two QBs on the opposing sides of the field who are playing one on one in football, but now you are posting those stats from years before Shanahan even coached the niners. 

🙄💩🤥🤡🤦‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, X-Clown said:

Lol, it’s bad enough that you can’t display critical thinking to just post WINZ WINZ WINZ like it’s literally only the two QBs on the opposing sides of the field who are playing one on one in football, but now you are posting those stats from years before Shanahan even coached the niners. 

🙄💩🤥🤡🤦‍♂️

Kenjon Barner has 3 Super Bowl rings. Clearly need to bring him in to upgrade the RB position.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

 

Jimmy G. is the epitome of a difference maker...

the key to great trolling is for people to largely think you might be serious.  You generally do a good job.  now you are just getting lazy.   This is C- grade troll work. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, CRA said:

the key to great trolling is for people to largely think you might be serious.  You generally do a good job.  now you are just getting lazy.   This is C- grade troll work. 

I have expressed no personal opinion in any way, shape, or form...

...simply listed The Jimmy-G Man's records/accomplishments...

...as the inimitable Bill Parcells said -- "you are what your record says you are"... 🤙.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well then I guess David Tepper is an absolute loser.

Under his leadership, the Panthers can't even reach a 500 season.

He will ignore this point. I’ve brought it up twice and he just pretends like it doesn’t exist because his ONLY point that makes Jimmy G great makes his beloved Tepper look bad. What a dilemma for Sizzle…

Also PJ Walker has quite the record as a starter, and you are what your record is…

Edited by ForJimmy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

...as the inimitable Bill Parcells said -- "you are what your record says you are"... 🤙.

 

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well then I guess David Tepper is an absolute loser.

Under his leadership, the Panthers can't even reach a 500 season.

My goodness that backfired on ol' SizzleBuzz.

200.gif

GIF by Saturday Night Live

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Barner doesn't hardly touch the ball. A little different than a starting QB

And a QB is hardly the only player driving wins and losses. That as a flagship reason to get a QB is as nonsensical as my comment about Barner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well then I guess David Tepper is an absolute loser.

Under his leadership, the Panthers can't even reach a 500 season.

It takes time to turn around a complex business organization like an NFL team (a point clearly lost on you 🤦‍♂️).

In baseball parlance we are in the top of the 2nd inning with no outs and a 2-2 count…

…get back to me during the 7th inning stretch on Big Tepp’s “record” 🤣👊.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

It takes time to turn around a complex business organization like an NFL team (a point clearly lost on you 🤦‍♂️).

In baseball parlance we are in the top of the 2nd inning with no outs and a 2-2 count…

…get back to me during the 7th inning stretch on Big Tepp’s “record” 🤣👊.

Plenty of teams have produced winning programs in less time.

"You are what your record says you are" was your standard.

By that standard (again, as applied by you) David Tepper is, after four years under his watch, a sh-tty owner. No amount of attempted spin will change that.

I'd guess that he might not like hearing that you consider him terrible at his job.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I have expressed no personal opinion in any way, shape, or form...

...simply listed The Jimmy-G Man's records/accomplishments...

...as the inimitable Bill Parcells said -- "you are what your record says you are"... 🤙.

Parcels was saying that about the team, not specifically the quarterback. Which is hilarious given how much you love to prop up Matt Rhule and ignore his record which speaks pretty loudly about who he is.
 

By your definition, Matthew Stafford’s career record with the Lions of 74-90-1 means that he’s a loser. I wonder why the Rams decided to trade for him since their previous QB had a much better winning record of 42-27 with a Super Bowl appearance and other playoff appearances. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

Parcels was saying that about the team, not specifically the quarterback. Which is hilarious given how much you love to prop up Matt Rhule and ignore his record which speaks pretty loudly about who he is.
 

By your definition, Matthew Stafford’s career record with the Lions of 74-90-1 means that he’s a loser. I wonder why the Rams decided to trade for him since their previous QB had a much better winning record of 42-27 with a Super Bowl appearance and other playoff appearances. 

lol 

Sizzle logic 

Jared Goff is a game changer 

Matt Stafford is a bum 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...