Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Solid depth on OL


musicman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Let's say Icky is the starting LT and Brady LG. Bozeman at C, Corbett at RG and Moton at LT.

That leaves you Brady and then Erving as back up tackles. Elfein and then, Cade and Brown as back up Guards. Elfein and then Cade as back up center. 

9 man crew when it's usually 10 opens up another slot. That should be a top 15 in the league if the gel and stay healthy. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, musicman said:

Let's say Icky is the starting LT and Brady LG. Bozeman at C, Corbett at RG and Moton at LT.

That leaves you Brady and then Erving as back up tackles. Elfein and then, Cade and Brown as back up Guards. Elfein and then Cade as back up center. 

9 man crew when it's usually 10 opens up another slot. That should be a top 15 in the league if the gel and stay healthy. 

I think our offensive line looks pretty good.  Always room for improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

If we could use Tremble as a FB and TE, we could free up 2 roster spots.

I agree. This makes a lot of sense. Giovanni Rici was a wasted roster spot last year IMO. It makes as much sense as Subbing in Cam at QB to run a QB sneak on the 1 yard line...

Makes Sense GIFs | Tenor

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starting LG is the only 'problem' spot.  If someone can take command of that position, the OL will be solid.  As I have said about LG earlier, I'd prefer a salty veteran next to Ickey.  I'm not sure he's on this roster.   I'd be content to wait to roster cut downs at the end of camp to maybe find this guy.  Unlike center and tackle, guards are the easiest position to pick up quickly on the OL.  I wouldn't be worried about the late arrival as much as I am concerned about getting the right guy in that spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not hard to find the 8 O-linemen that will stay.  The 9th OL guy is up for debate.  Brown is probably the best bet now, but he couldn't make the roster last year.  Daley, Jordan, Tecklenburg, Horton, Pleasants are on one-year/expiring deals with Daley the only one carrying dead cap (only ($735k).  I haven't seen Miller's contract and I doubt it's of consequence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Michael G said:

I agree. This makes a lot of sense. Giovanni Rici was a wasted roster spot last year IMO. It makes as much sense as Subbing in Cam at QB to run a QB sneak on the 1 yard line...

I agree with you.  To take it even farther, having Ricci in the game was a complete telegraph to the defense since the only thing he ever did was block.  He never carried the ball.  Never caught the ball.  "Follow me to the point of attack everyone!"

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Cade or Brown would be better at G than Brady Christensen?

 

still I think having brady as our back up LT is great depth.

I still wonder if Brady would be the better LT, at least this year than Icky? Icky at LG and Brady at LT could be the better combo atleast for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, musicman said:

Let's say Icky is the starting LT and Brady LG. Bozeman at C, Corbett at RG and Moton at LT.

That leaves you Brady and then Erving as back up tackles. Elfein and then, Cade and Brown as back up Guards. Elfein and then Cade as back up center. 

9 man crew when it's usually 10 opens up another slot. That should be a top 15 in the league if the gel and stay healthy. 

There are a LOT of ifs there. 

Keep in mind that includes some pretty bad lineman that if forced into action will torpedo at least one spot on the OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

There are a LOT of ifs there. 

Keep in mind that includes some pretty bad lineman that if forced into action will torpedo at least one spot on the OL.

Yep. Brown's still a theory, Brady actually has to take the spot, and Elflein and Erving are both real, real rough when they actually get PT. If someone gets hurt it's better to be able to throw Elf or Erving into whatever spot opens up than have to re-shuffle the whole line, but it still creates a serious weak spot at whatever position they have to play.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I agree with you.  To take it even farther, having Ricci in the game was a complete telegraph to the defense since the only thing he ever did was block.  He never carried the ball.  Never caught the ball.  "Follow me to the point of attack everyone!"

And he wasn't a very good blocker-(He was a WR in college). Tremble is known as very good blocker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...