Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Christensen


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

The fact that we are rationally debating where/when two young up and coming linemen will play is refreshing compared to last year. 

Yeah the real story here IMO is that apparently Christensen looks really good. I guess I’m one of the few people happy about that. The lineup stuff is so fluid at this point in the off-season, so panicking about it is super premature. I swear, the same people losing their minds in here are also the same exact people who were convinced for months leading up to the draft that we were gonna draft Kenny Pickett at 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is very frustrating to a LOT of people how BC was used last year.  It's nice to hear that he is looking good now, and surprise, he's being played in the position he excelled at in college.  While it would kinda suck because of where we drafted him, at least Ickey has clear talent as a guard.  I daresay he won't get walked back to the QB on the regular the way pretty much every guard we had last year did.

I don't really care WHO plays LT or LG or whatever.  I just want to see our coaches stop trying to impose their idea of where a player should play and instead observe the players and see where they can have the greatest impact on the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Why am I not surprised by this. I get gamesmanship and all but Rhule is an odd duck.  I just do not get playing a rookie out of position from the start.  One would think you would want to get them ready to go at their natural position before seeing what else they can do, but not here.  I guess they value universal ( fits everywhere but not good at any) oline players more than one being great at one spot and so so at others.

Rhule's approach is stupid.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

If playing BC at Left Tackle with Ickey at guard gives us our best combo so be it I just want to see quality Oline play 

It would give us an opportunity for best 5 which I’m a fan of. LG will also give Icky Thump plenty of opportunities to pull.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Swaggasaurus said:

It would give us an opportunity for best 5 which I’m a fan of. LG will also give Icky Thump plenty of opportunities to pull.

If i was the OC I'd rather pull with BC. He is athletic and I like the idea of putting him on a LB, Safety, or CB. Icky could wall those plays off or just be better at moving bigger ends and edges out of the way. That said if he was pulling I pity whoever gets in his way.

I Pity The Fool GIFs | Tenor

Edited by Michael G
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd just feel a lot better if Rhule would defer to the OL coach on the specific lineup. It seems like he defers almost completely to Snow in terms of the defensive lineup. Do the same elsewhere. Don't fuging micromanage everything. You hired these guys to do a job. Let them do their job. If you don't think an OL coach is capable of determining the appropriate lineup then he probably shouldn't be your OL coach.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

No doubt. Last year, it was apparent to everyone that our OL was going to be poo except the couple guys who posted threads trying to convince us Elflein and Erving would be good. 😂

What’s also amazing is that, maybe, just maybe, BC put in time in the weight room and practice in the off-season and gasp, made himself better.

Nah, let’s keep bitching about Rhule not playing rookies when they start 6 games and play half the snaps. The amount of rookies we’ve played meaningful snaps the past two years is huge but somehow Rhule, who I don’t like, is sabotaging BC’s and Corral’s careers because he’d much rather play Daley and Darnold. He’s the coach boys, enjoy another evaluation season with a chance we are competing for a playoff spot while we try and get a real QB of the future.

I get your point but you have to acknowledge that having your choice of tackles in the draft, selecting said tackle and then saying A) that the draft pick isnt in shape and B)there is someone already on the team better then you at the position is at best a weak troll attempt and at worst a fuging retarded ass statement.   Rhule just shut your fuging mouth for once

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

He was playing against people who likely didn’t even make the team. He wasn’t a starter in preseason. Brown looked OK in preseason too. Marshall had the second most yards in the NFL in the preseason. Most vets never even played a snap, so looking good in preseason meant nothing. I don’t remember preseason videos of BC man handling Burns and Reddick, do you?

He was a 3rd rounder so I don’t see any issue with a coach not starting him right away and let’s be honest Miller and Daley at Gs were atrocious and Elflein got hurt. Again, playing him first at guard isn’t surprising given how bad we were there and the fact that they evaluated him as a guard.

My point was that he wasn’t going to be a week 1 starter since we invested in FA OL. We knew they sucked, our GM didn’t, but they were going to start. Even then he still played almost half the snaps on the year. If you think he would have saved the season, that’s funny, but he played more than enough snaps to be evaluated. The post I replied to acted as if he played as much as Brown and we have no idea how he’d do.

It’s funny because it almost seems as if people think we have a Sewell or Slater on our hands and that Iky was a wasted pick. Man, Iky’s already a bust.

I'm not saying Icky's a bust. But there are things that happened last year that didn't make sense. Rhule said publicly he evaluated an all pro LT as a guard. Same thing he said about BC. He was more concerned about arm length than ability to play the position. Anyone who watched him play inside could tell he was not a guard or center. He didn't have the power to play there. 

Irving and Elfein were always huge WTF signings. Neither had a history of being healthy or very good, but we went after them on day 1  in FA because they fit the versatile lineman role. Just because you're a FA doesn't mean you should be starting. Normally those 2 would have been week 2 or 3 of FA moves for some team. 

I realize BC didn't play against elite talent in preseason but he actually looked better than Irving. His form was better and more fluid. His feet were quicker. He just looked better. 

Then we get into the whole part of trying to teach him to play 4 different positions as a rookie. Rhule loves guys to be able to play all over the line. Sometimes you just need to let them play where they are best. 

No one who looked out our OL last year game 1 thought, man this is a good line. Nothing we did on our offensive line made sense last year. 

Armchair GM, we would have Slater over Horn and BC would be doing what he does somewhere else. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I definitely don't want to give up on Christensen yet. He only got decent time when 90% of the roster, coaching staff, fanbase and front office mailed it in for the year, as they always do by mid-November. Along with Ickey, Ian Thomas and Foreman, he's an offensive player I'm most intrigued about this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • awesome interview. Love the guy. 
    • all the trades and using PFFs draft rankings and Gemini's analysis: This is a high-value mock draft that effectively uses trade-down strategies to rebuild the Carolina Panthers' defensive interior and add depth to a roster with multiple holes. By turning mid-round capital into a volume of picks, you've secured several "sliding" stars and developmental high-ceiling players. Based on 2026 PFF big board trends and player value, here is the analysis: Draft Grade: A- The Top Picks: Interior Dominance  * 19. Peter Woods (DT, Clemson): Getting Woods at 19 is a steal. Heading into the 2025 season, he was viewed as a potential top-5 talent. While his production dipped slightly, his 4.75 40-yard dash at 315 lbs is elite. He provides the Panthers with a versatile disruptor who can play 3-tech or slide outside.  * 63. Dontay Corleone (DT, Cincinnati): "The Godfather" is one of the best pure nose tackles in the class. Pairing him with Woods creates an immediate identity for the Panthers' front seven. PFF loves his "unmovable" anchor. Securing him at the end of Round 2 after trading down from 51/53 is excellent value. The Mid-Round Steals  * 83. Deontae Lawson (LB, Alabama): Lawson is a high-IQ "green dot" linebacker. Many scouts projected him as a late 1st or early 2nd rounder before an ACL injury in late 2024. Getting a 2-time Alabama captain at 83 to lead the defense is a massive win for culture and stability.  * 130. Drew Allar (QB, Penn State): This is the "high-upside lottery ticket" pick. Allar has prototypical size (6'5", 240 lbs) and a massive arm. His stock fell due to a 2025 ankle injury and inconsistency, but at 130, he’s a low-risk, high-reward backup/successor to Bryce Young if the former No. 1 pick continues to struggle. Trade Analysis & Late Round Value Your strategy of "tier-dropping" (trading 51 for 53/121 and 53 for 63/95) allowed you to stay in the same talent bracket while picking up Kevin Coleman Jr. (WR) and Genesis Smith (S).  * 168. Parker Brailsford (OC, Alabama): Great value for a technical center who can compete for a depth spot.  * 169. Tacario Davis (CB, Washington): At 6'4", he is a rare physical specimen at corner. PFF and other boards often have him as a Day 2 talent; getting him in the 5th round (via the 161 trade) is arguably your best value pick of the draft. Summary of Picks | Pick | Player | Position | School | Analysis | | 19 | Peter Woods | DT | Clemson | Elite traits; Top-10 ceiling. | | 63 | Dontay Corleone | DT | Cincinnati | Best run stuffer in the class. | | 83 | Deontae Lawson | LB | Alabama | Vocal leader; sliding due to injury. | | 121 | Kevin Coleman Jr. | WR | Missouri | Speed threat to complement the room. | | 130 | Drew Allar | QB | Penn State | High-ceiling developmental passer. | | 169 | Tacario Davis | CB | Washington | Massive reach/length for a late flyer. | Final Verdict You addressed the trenches aggressively and took advantage of "injury discounts" on Lawson and Allar. The only minor critique is that the roster still feels thin at Edge (until the 211 pick), but the sheer volume of talent added to the interior DL and Secondary compensates for it.
    • But but the concerts    Soccer is not the reason we have turf, soccer players want real grass even more than football players. 
×
×
  • Create New...