Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield is a Carolina Panther


uncfan888
 Share

Recommended Posts

Well, okay, it's done. He'll be wearing Panthers blue and I'll be cheering for him. I hope he has the success with us that Drew Brees had with his second team.

This is the best roll of the dice we've had at QB since Cam went down -- the most upside, the most wins brought to the table, the biggest axe to grind and make a name for himself, with one of the smallest costs. Mayfield played in a much tougher (physically and competition-wise) division than the NFCSouth and he was competitive there until injuries derailed him. He's gone through coaching changes and still outperformed what we've had on the field. He's coming off surgery on his shoulder, but that could have fixed the problems he'd been having. He did play through a lot of pain last year.

Now, that being said... 

If Mayfield doesn't work here, Rhule will have to pack up and move. It's just that simple. In three seasons, Rhule has had three different first round draft pick QBs -- Bridgewater (32nd), Darnold (3rd) and Mayfield (1). All three were veterans on the field, two of whom had posted winning seasons in their careers and had been praised for their abilities. If you can't coach with basically three shots at a 1st rounder QB and plenty of pro tape on them, then you can't do the job.

Good luck to Baker, I really want to see him shine here. I think if anyone needed a new home, he sure did.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Thats what I would do with Corral not with a 5th year vet like baker.  He needs wins and stats to get a new deal. 

I'm not comfortable using wins and losses to judge individual players in a team sport.

Coaches and GMs? Yeah (with a few qualifications) but not individual players...including quarterbacks.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Carl Spackler said:

What does Dr. Lunker think of all this?

Has he posted a tweet and tagged disgraced former UNC basketball coach Matt Doherty yet?

He was on the Garoppolo train, I think.

Also pretty sure he predicted there was no way Cleveland would give up Mayfield because they needed him in case of Watson's suspension 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

That's the problem. I can't see the long term plan here. 

He plays really well, hes the potential long term qb.  He plays bad, he walks at the end the year and Matt got to not be rushed and learn the playbook and he will be ready step in.  Either of those are potential long term plans.  Those are pretty much the only two scenarios and I don't see either being especially bad.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, poundaway said:

Cleveland didn't have the best OL in football when they were the worst team in the league. 

The point is, Baker is not going to perform better in Carolina than he did in Cleveland because the OL, RB contingent and WR group were very very good during his time there.  He didn't throw for that many yards in 2020 anyway.  Teddy had more yards here in 2020.  Cleveland was one of the best running teams in he league.

I'm not saying Baker sucks.  I'm saying its unlikely that Baker will play better here.  He's better than Sam, its just hard to say how much.  Sam never, ever, had the #1 OL in the NFL at the end of the end of the season.  Ever.    What would Baker's career look like at the Jets and then Carolina last year?

Baker has proven he can play in the league, Darnold has not.  That's the biggest difference to me.  They both went to shitty organizations and Baker found success where Darnold could not.  Darnold even went to another franchise with the same results. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ITT: I learn that apparently half the board thought Matt Corral was the second coming of Christ and Baker is standing in the way of his apotheosis to instant football godhood.

I'm excited about Corral too. But he's a third round rookie. Getting a year on the bench can only be good for him. And an instant upgrade at QB is definitely good for the Panthers.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tr3ach said:

He plays really well, hes the potential long term qb.  He plays bad, he walks at the end the year and Matt got to not be rushed and learn the playbook and he will be ready step in.  Either of those are potential long term plans.  Those are pretty much the only two scenarios and I don't see either being especially bad.

theres 3 scenarios, you left off simply average

 

What if he has a 2020 type average year?  Winning 8-9 games.  What the fug do you do then?  Keep rhule, resign baker, let him walk, franchise him?  Like I said its not a plan just creating issues down the road

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...