Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayfield for peanuts and a coke...


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don't feel bad for Darnold. Twenty six and set for life is a great place to be. Even if he never plays another down...smiling all the way to the bank. I would take that trade off any day of the week.

Edited by Jmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't believe people are crying over this trade. No way M.C was starting no matter who the QB was. Sure Mayfield may have personality issues, but that is irrelevant now. 

Carrol will get his chance. This sucking just to hopefully get a top five pick next year is ridiculous. Same people who are bitching about this trade, would be bitching about a 4 or 5 win season. Can't win with this crowd 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Patience paid off, what a steal. Anyone complaining about this deal either is perpetually miserable or doesn't understand how the NFL works. Not sure which is worse 

Or just think that he's garbage and not impressed at getting garbage on the discount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

Fugging get what you pay for. Going to a great restaurant and just getting a chunk of stale bread because it's the cheapest thing on the menu.

Yeah, cuz there was such a large menu to choose from

Christmas Vacation Ok GIF

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jmac said:

Can't believe people are crying over this trade. No way M.C was starting no matter who the QB was. Sure Mayfield may have personality issues, but that is irrelevant now. 

Carrol will get his chance. This sucking just to hopefully get a top five pick next year is ridiculous. Same people who are bitching about this trade, would be bitching about a 4 or 5 win season. Can't win with this crowd 

1652320895598.gif.42bcb7dc4b1d94af4e5635a795d88129.gif

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Had they just made this deal last season...

Man, it probably would have been a first, second, and a conventional fourth last season. No way they'd have gotten him on the cheap. They had to learn what the hell they were doing. But we're in an overall better position this season with the O-line and healthy status of McCaffrey, TMJ, and the addition of Higgins who has history with Baker.

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bruschetta is made with stale bread… have to add the tomatoes, olive oil & garlic, some provolone depending on where you go.. but damn! If bruschetta isn’t some tasty stale bread.. not on its own, but the right ingredients, that simple mixture is amazing..  

 

at the same time, some places want to add some kind of olive, yafeelme, it ruins something so hard to fug up but yet does, ya feel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, philit99 said:

Acquiring Baker would have commanded a fortune last season.

Crazily it would have cost the same as Darnold, since their contracts are required to be the same. The trade might have cost us more than it did now, but probably along the same lines as Darnold's did now.

Smart shopping can really make the difference I guess. If we just new what would be on special ahead of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...