Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ITS HAPPENING! BLACK HELMETS CONFIRMED!


joemac
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

 

 

It looks good on the Ravens and Falcons because they have colors that go well with it. Those photo shops demonstrate the color scheme doesn't work in my opinion. 

Though not a hill I care to die on. Just my honest opinion.

So red and purple go with black and blue doesn't?  I think most colors work with it...  Our jerseys are already blue/black.  If you don't like it though that's your opinion.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Hard disagree. The silver is dated and looks like crap with the rest of the uniform. Black helmet immediately improves the look of each uniform combo. 

Are the Packers dated?

Cowboys?

Steelers?

Giants?

Colts?

 

How about Penn st

Michigan 

USC?

Alabama?

Cubs?

Yankees?

Red Sox?

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Are the Packers dated?

Cowboys?

Steelers?

Giants?

Colts?

 

How about Penn st

Michigan 

USC?

Alabama?

Cubs?

Yankees?

Red Sox?

You realize several of these teams have had refreshed looks?  Especially the Cowboys...

https://www.nfl.com/photos/cowboys-uniforms-through-the-years-0ap3000000815354#a438e4ec-669c-441e-885c-e475bc66fb0c

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Because like iconic teams across all sports you shouldn't change your uniform. 

Don't change. Just win.

We're a long way from "iconic" 😕

Changes to uniform aesthetics don't bother me. I could see some level of annoyance if they were changing a longtime logo or something like that (though I thought our logo change was an improvement) but changing a color scheme, moving a stripe, switching a font or some such? Not a big deal to me. Add in that for the moment, it's just one game anyway.

Heck, if teams never made changes, Cincinnati would still be stuck with those ugly helmets that had the word "BENGALS" on the side rather than the tiger stripes.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dang, we might not be able to create the same magic from last year!
    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2023 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 NCAA season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
×
×
  • Create New...