Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

News from other NFL camps

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I am on record saying we should have gotten Howell with our next pick and had both he and corral battling it out.   Improves our odds dramatically.

What about next year's class?  Draft one again in the first?  It would be crazy value to have one where Howell was drafted.....

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

What about next year's class?  Draft one again in the first?  It would be crazy value to have one where Howell was drafted.....

not following your here

In theory if we drafted both and not traded for baker I think, if managed correctly (which is you know comical at best) that if either howell or corral are going to be starters in the nfl that one would emerge during camp and in the season.  But I get Rhule doesnt have the luxury of doing that.  He has pissed away any building timeline from the past 2 years

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

not following your here

In theory if we drafted both and not traded for baker I think, if managed correctly (which is you know comical at best) that if either howell or corral are going to be starters in the nfl that one would emerge during camp and in the season.  But I get Rhule doesnt have the luxury of doing that.  He has pissed away any building timeline from the past 2 years

If we drafted Corral and Howell (which I’m not against) and we underperform so we get a new coach next year. Would would want use our draft on another young QB in the 1st to compete? We would have a crowded but cheap QB room. 
With just Corral m it seems easier to justify drafting another next year than if we have 2 rookies IMO. 

Edited by ForJimmy
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

If we drafted Corral and Howell (which I’m not against) and we underperform so we get a new coach next year. Would would want use our draft on another young QB in the 1st to compete? We would have a crowded but cheap QB room. 

Gotcha,  depending on how the qb looked.  If both were just looking like 3rd and 5th round picks and probably career back ups then yes go for a new one in the first with a new staff.

 

If either of the 2 showed promise even if we were still losing games then just keep rolling with them. 

 

My gut and brain however simply says the odds are astronomical for either to be quality franchise qbs and the new staff is going to have to draft a new guy in the first in 2023.   Ive said it 1000 times this is why "red shirting" corral this season is fuging retarded.  Roll his ass out there in TC, roll his ass out there in preseason and lets see what we are dealing with.    If he can play he can play.  

 

Take last night for example.  Willis is a bigger project then MC.  By a country mile a bigger project but he showed last night he has potential and skill set to be a nfl qb.  I dont think sitting him is going to do him any favors, he needs reps and experience.  If for whatever reason the titans tanked and had a top 5 pick I doubt they go with a new qb with willis already on their team.  Basically what I am saying is if corral shows any promise in the preseason games his ass needs to play something meaningful at some point in the season. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Gotcha,  depending on how the qb looked.  If both were just looking like 3rd and 5th round picks and probably career back ups then yes go for a new one in the first with a new staff.

 

If either of the 2 showed promise even if we were still losing games then just keep rolling with them. 

 

My gut and brain however simply says the odds are astronomical for either to be quality franchise qbs and the new staff is going to have to draft a new guy in the first in 2023.   Ive said it 1000 times this is why "red shirting" corral this season is fuging retarded.  Roll his ass out there in TC, roll his ass out there in preseason and lets see what we are dealing with.    If he can play he can play.  

 

Take last night for example.  Willis is a bigger project then MC.  By a country mile a bigger project but he showed last night he has potential and skill set to be a nfl qb.  I dont think sitting him is going to do him any favors, he needs reps and experience.  If for whatever reason the titans tanked and had a top 5 pick I doubt they go with a new qb with willis already on their team.  Basically what I am saying is if corral shows any promise in the preseason games his ass needs to play something meaningful at some point in the season. 

I can see both sides.  I believe Corral has hinted towards not being ready and Baker being one of the biggest helps out of all of his teammates.  It will be good to have a vet like Baker out there while our line learns to gel and let a young QB like Corral or draft pick take over a much more stable OL.  Willis flashed some potential, but it was also a preseason game and teams aren't really game-planning around him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

not following your here

In theory if we drafted both and not traded for baker I think, if managed correctly (which is you know comical at best) that if either howell or corral are going to be starters in the nfl that one would emerge during camp and in the season.  But I get Rhule doesnt have the luxury of doing that.  He has pissed away any building timeline from the past 2 years

I also wanted to double dip last year and not take Baker. This staff is stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mother Grabber Grand Master

Mother Grabber

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I am on record saying we should have gotten Howell with our next pick and had both he and corral battling it out.   Improves our odds dramatically.

like when the chargers had breesus and rivers. hope that at least one pans out, and if you get lucky and hit on both, you can trade one for a big return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cranky
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By cranky · Posted

      Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • XClown1986
      Post-Draft: Gantt sets A stage, not THE stage. Perhaps Reset Your Expectations

      By XClown1986 · Posted

      I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...