Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This sequence from Matt Corral


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

Exactly, but he threw a ton of picks his sophomore year and has improved that each year and Im not really talking about picks. Im talking about his reads and missing open receivers. Also, adjusting to an NFL system will be somewhat of a struggle for him early. 

Nah, man. He's just beginning. He was damned good in college. He can't help the system that he played in. There is no evidence that he's a bad decision maker. Give him time to develop and some consistent time to actually create a body of work before criticizing him.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's obviously got the fastest legs and quickest release on the athletic side. Lack of reps is the most concerning thing to me and thats on coaching. Probably won't change unless someone in front of him gets injured. That's how Brady and Herbert and Baker took over the starting roles previously, just glad he's obviously not getting complacent being 3rd/4th string

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

So what's the preseason plan in people minds? A quarter for each guy? It's weird because generally teams only play their starters serious minutes in the 3rd game but we're possibly looking at all 3 games being a competition at QB

My guess is a few starters won't play are all this presason: Horn, definitely CMC and maybe a few more. But I think Baker, Sam, PJ(I have no idea why Rhule has a hard on for this guy), and Corral will all get some playing time. I wouldn't be surprised if Mayfield and Darnold both play all 3 games. But I also wouldn't be surprised if Rhule announced Mayfield and Darnold sit out games 1 and 3 and only play maybe a quarter apiece in the 2nd game.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

My guess is a few starters won't play are all this presason: Horn, definitely CMC and maybe a few more. But I think Baker, Sam, PJ(I have no idea why Rhule has a hard on for this guy), and Corral will all get some playing time. I wouldn't be surprised if Mayfield and Darnold both play all 3 games. But I also wouldn't be surprised if Rhule announced Mayfield and Darnold sit out games 1 and 3 and only play maybe a quarter apiece in the 2nd game.

Yeah strange situation to be in. I think if Rhule had a boner for Corral like he did Chuba, we'd get to see the same amount of preseason reps. Chuba got like 80% of the snaps in those games last year it felt like. Rhule seems to like to force certain guys into success and not give others much of a chance 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

He's obviously got the fastest legs and quickest release on the athletic side. Lack of reps is the most concerning thing to me and thats on coaching. Probably won't change unless someone in front of him gets injured. That's how Brady and Herbert and Baker took over the starting roles previously, just glad he's obviously not getting complacent being 3rd/4th string

Best case is he looks so good that they are comfortable outright cutting the loser of the baker/darnold battle for starter and he’s set as backup during the year 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, bruceleeroy said:

When he wins a playoff game wake me up.  Dude hasn't seen a second of actual game time. 

If every player went from the bench to playoffs the world would be boring.  

I'd like to see him on the field.  I personally believe Corral is our future.   It will be enjoyable watching him grow which may include losing a some games.

If you only want to see him when we reach the playoffs you've probably missed seeing him grow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something about Corral already feels way different (better) than most QBs we’ve had come through here. I kinda see him having at the very least a Minshew-esque career eventually. Hopefully better than that and soon, but not ideal having his reps limited behind Sam...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...