Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official 2023 QB Watch


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, SOJA said:

fully in to the camp of we need to trade up with the Bears at number two to get either Young or Stroud. fug it go get your QB. 

 

Bears will def be ok with a trade down as they have a lot of holes and 8-9 is a good range to get talent 

I'd be shocked if they don't trade that pick because yeah, they have a talented young QB to work with and they need a LOT of roster upgrades. They don't need the #2 overall pick. They need a bevy of picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd be shocked if they don't trade that pick because yeah, they have a talented young QB to work with and they need a LOT of roster upgrades. They don't need the #2 overall pick. They need a bevy of picks.

isn't that what I said ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ncfan said:

@Verge

what are your current thoughts on Levis?

I think Bryce will go off the board at 1.

And while I like Stroud.  I wish we wouldn’t trade Up for a QB.  Allowing us to use those 2nd-3rd rd pick on other needs.

Its a slippery slope, i would love to use those 2 2nd rounders but if you really think stroud is the goods you gotta go for it and secure the most important position on the team for the foreseeable future. Who says we are not in a situation where we would have to trade up next year? Atleast we have the extra picks right now and also in the top 10. The timing might be the best right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Am I the only one who thinks Atlanta will go QB?

The amount of mocks I’ve seen without anyone mocking them a QB blows my mind. Ridder isn’t the long term solution and if 1 of the 4 are still on the board I think you have to try

They could, but Ridder has some nice traits and they can get a long look at him next season and look at a nice potentially loaded class that next offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

They could, but Ridder has some nice traits and they can get a long look at him next season and look at a nice potentially loaded class that next offseason. 

Exactly our situation with Corral and maybe bearded Darnold. 

Edited by ECHornet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...