Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cmac Had Only 14 Touches!!!


Catsfan69
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Yea why didn't Foreman get any carries?

They completely ignored the run game until the second half. Usually when this happens they’ll go run heavy the next game, lose, then make excuses that they didn’t throw the ball enough. Same thing every year with this coach. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pantherj said:

We wanted to attack the Browns weakness imo, and that clearly their secondary. Running against that d-line was exactly what the Browns wanted. Even though we upgraded our o-line from last season we're still not good enough in that area. The Panthers staff probably looked at the match ups between our o-line and their d-line and concluded that running a lot was a very bad idea. They know ahead of time how the trench battle will go and game plan accordingly.

I mean that's fair. But abandoning the Run game completely is not ideal. Makes us one dimensional and let's guys like Myles Garrett eat. Any who, I'm about to my 24 hour mark. I'll continue this argument on Sunday when the same occurs.LOL

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Diehardpanth02 said:

I mean that's fair. But abandoning the Run game completely is not ideal. Makes us one dimensional and let's guys like Myles Garrett eat. Any who, I'm about to my 24 hour mark. I'll continue this argument on Sunday when the same occurs.LOL

Yeah I've lost my steam for this topic. On to the next game/disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jasonluckydog said:

Jesus H Christ people this is our 4th preseason game, just this one counted. You gotta ease him back in. This was a great game for the limited amount of time these guys have been together.  Let's wait till the Giants game before we burn this bitch down 

Leaning on your new QB when you have a elite RB is not easing anyone in. Not having the RB in full form by the start of the season sounds like this staff though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Leaning on your new QB when you have a elite RB is not easing anyone in. Not having the RB in full form by the start of the season sounds like this staff though.

leaning on your new QB (who didn't get a starter work load going in) and not even putting the 1 WR he has legit chemistry with and knows on the field for a single snap. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Pimpdaddy said:

right.... Hes fraud... CMC  up the middle again..how original...

He has broken several 50 plus yd runs up the middle. Up the middle is fine if we block.

 

You remember the Pittsburgh lines under Cower? The backs would go 4 or 5 yds without being touched. If we could do that he'd score like Techmo Bowl Bo Jackson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, WarHeel said:

Yeah, let’s run him into the ground like we have for 5 years straight. That’s worked out well the last two years for our record and his health.

I get you, but less than 20 touches is just not going to get it done.  Too many times he was a decoy.  If you are going to put him on the field he needs to be an option not a decoy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

He has broken several 50 plus yd runs up the middle. Up the middle is fine if we block.

 

You remember the Pittsburgh lines under Cower? The backs would go 4 or 5 yds without being touched. If we could do that he'd score like Techmo Bowl Bo Jackson

...its a pipe dream for us... Shitsburgh put a premium on linemen...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, pantherj said:

When you face a really tall and powerful d-line, you had better hope your QB is tall. 6'1 was not enough against those monsters, but you can still win. Poor Baker looked 5'8 at times out there against that pack of werewolves.

Well as a former O and d lineman it's the olines responsibility to get their hands down.

A cut when they jump or a blocking punch to just above the groin is typically enough to get them to flinch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, pantherj said:

We wanted to attack the Browns weakness imo, and that clearly their secondary. Running against that d-line was exactly what the Browns wanted. Even though we upgraded our o-line from last season we're still not good enough in that area. The Panthers staff probably looked at the match ups between our o-line and their d-line and concluded that running a lot was a very bad idea. They know ahead of time how the trench battle will go and game plan accordingly.

Yeah but some screens to Cmac would have slowed down that D. Then gash them some behind Icky and combo block Myles and beat him up a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I thought we used him too much early on last year, but this was the worst game plan I’ve ever seen with a healthy CMC.  Volume aside, the offensive play calling didn’t do much to get him the ball in space.

I haven't seen such a crap game plan since I saw Mike Shula run the offense. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...