Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Something to remember


Panthering
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Panthering said:

That's the best running attack we'll see all year, strength vs weakness was always going to be a tough matchup. 

Barkley just went for 164 yards at 9 yards a pop vs the Titans this weekend.  He looks pretty healthy and the exact type RB we aren't built to defend.  238 yards on the ground as a team. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barkley

Kamara

Murray/Conner

Shannahan Running offense. 
 

This weak run defense and sub optimal interior and linebacker play is gonna get hashed this year. 
 

Chinn needs to be in the box at all times. We’re gonna have to play man on the outside and hope these young corners can hold their on. 
 

for the record. The 8th pick in the draft from a few years ago needs to start pulling his weight. We should not be getting manhandled after spending a top ten pick on a defensive tackle. Browns a bust. 

Edited by bigdog10
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see:

  • Giants - Barkley - Thicc boi in all the right ways for a RB. He will run a train on our defense
  • NO - Kamara - Stud
  • AZ - Connor, who is good but we always beat AZ for Jake's revenge so I am penciling this one in as a win regardless.
  • SF - Kyle Shannahan's offense that could get paraplegics 1k yard seasons. This will be an issue.
  • LA - Meh, nothing special here, we have a shot to stop the run
  • TB - LOL doesn't even matter we will lose
  • @ ATL - We have a shot
  • Cincy - Joe Mixon is a stud. bad matchup
  • ATL - We have a shot
  • BAL - The best Rushing team in the NFL. No shot
  • Denver - Dunno yet but they have a good 1-2 punch at RB, outlook not great
  • Seattle - We have a shot
  • Pitt - Harris went down, depending on the severity we have a shot
  • Detroit - Swift is about to go beast mode on the NFL. He's this season's breakout RB. 
  • TB - Lol again, we lose
  • NO - Kamara again

So, looking at the schedule, I don't agree with you at all OP, and I am in fact, very pessimistic about our chances moving forward. 

 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bigdog10 said:

The 8th pick in the draft from a few years ago needs to start pulling his weight. We should not be getting manhandled after spending a top ten pick on a defensive tackle. Browns a bust. 

Feel for Derrick a little bit, his play has certain disappointed at times but he should have never been selected that high. DT without a pass rush skillset is never a top 10-15 pick. I still like him though and hopefully he gets better. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...