Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we officially declare TMJ a bust?

TheBigKat

By TheBigKat,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

NorthTryon Mentor

NorthTryon

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Smith looks like a really exciting prospect and a guy we need to develop and involve more.  None of this can be said about TMJ. Did he get a jersey on Sunday? 

 

12 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

If he was on the field I missed it.  

What's crazy is they were showing him on the social media short vids like he was on the same level as DJ, Robbie, and CMAC. They showed him warming up with headphones making smooth catches from Baker in the endzone. Then I think I caught him in the frame once during game giving a five to Robbie on his touchdown. 

I was thinking we always get the defective toy. Chase and Jefferson out there beating double coverage and our guy the most formidable one on paper can't get on the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

I was fine letting Baker compete in Spartanburg.  He did that.   Rhule carried it pointlessly long.  That's Matt Rhule. 

and when you carry a competition too long, one that clearly isn't actually a competition at some point.....everyone sees that too.   

The options weren't give him the job the day he signed the contract or run it all the way until the 4th preseason game. 

I don't necessarily agree. Training camp is nice and all, but that doesn't give them an opportunity to see how they prepare for and compete against other NFL opponents'. One game isn't enough of a sample size for that either, unless there is a huge discrepancy between the two (which, unfortunately, Baker didn't create enough of). Two games + the joint practices though gives plenty of data to make an educated decision and let their teammates experience it.

Could they have made the announcement before week 3? Sure. Is a week going to be the difference between a solid performance and a shitty one? Seeing as how even elite QBs struggled this week and the NFL has shown a tendency for the first few weeks of games to be sloppy after the practice changes instituted by the CBA, I personally don't think so.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, CRA said:

it's little things.  Like BC last year, Rhule painfully put him on the field when forced and argued against things with silly nonsense.  BC comes back this offseason with Rhule not really seeing him and suddenly Rhule now says he is one of our best guys that has to be on the field.  There was no real time for that narrative to change so quick.  It was obvious BC should of gotten more work last year and be even further along today than he is if he had.  And he looks like a promosing OL asset. 

Matt Rhule makes everything hard.  Giving Baker the job was easy.  He made it hard.  

100% agreed on all counts.

I had the same thought about BC after the reviews and grades came out after week 1.  Like, we all knew he should've been playing early last season, yet he didn't.  Not to say he would've been THIS good last season, as a rookie, but he damn sure looked close when he got the chances.  And it made me think of Elf and Boze now...  And how Kenny Robinson could go from PS/fringe roster guy to coming in at the end of last season and outplaying every safety not named Chinn.  Or how Burris was the penciled in starter for the last two years, and all of a sudden goes from that to being cut and out on the PS behind the guys that were backing him up for two years, but Rhule swore by him...  And that's why it makes any and everything so hard to evaluate under Rhule, like you said.  I think so much of his decisions are driven by ego and that "smartest guy in the room" garbage, and it's compounded now by job insecurity, so I don't think you ever get pure, untainted motives with him.  It's so obvious in so many of these cases the best guys aren't  playing, and if he isn't playing the best guys then how can we even fairly evaluate the guys that are out there or when they do get out there, as everything seems to be tainted with some sort of dysfunctional agenda?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, Icege said:

 Two games + the joint practices though gives plenty of data to make an educated decision and let their teammates experience it.

Could they have made the announcement before week 3? Sure. Is a week going to be the difference between a solid performance and a shitty one? Seeing as how even elite QBs struggled this week and the NFL has shown a tendency for the first few weeks of games to be sloppy after the practice changes instituted by the CBA, I personally don't think so.

yeah, but Baker and Sam aren't unknowns.  There is a ton data to make an educated decision on that doesn't take up until the 4th preseason game to figure out.   That's another Rhule issue that consistently shows.   He struggles figuring out pretty obvious things.  Specifically, at QB but at a ton of spots.

and the elite QBs are textbook example of why reps and practice does matter going into a season.  Because even the elites that are largely protected don't look good going into a season without work.   A middle of the pack starter in a new system with all new players is going to need every rep he can get.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, but Baker and Sam aren't unknowns.  There is a ton data to make an educated decision on that doesn't take up until the 4th preseason game to figure out.   That's another Rhule issue that consistently shows.   He struggles figuring out pretty obvious things.  Specifically, at QB but at a ton of spots.

and the elite QBs are textbook example of why reps and practice does matter going into a season.  Because even the elites that are largely protected don't look good going into a season without work.   A middle of the pack starter in a new system with all new players is going to need every rep he can get.   

 

I'm with you on Baker clearly being better than Sam, no argument there.

However, in a team environment, he had to compete for the job. That's the part that I believe most fans, especially those without leadership experience (or aren't competent leaders themselves), don't understand. To them, it's obvious. To the guys that share battles together, they need to see that this is going to be a clear upgrade and not a downgrade like it had been when they brought Sam on initially.

EDIT: Wanted to point out that the leadership comment wasn't targeting you. Was just a general observation.

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Icege said:

I'm with you on Baker clearly being better than Sam, no argument there.

However, in a team environment, he had to compete for the job. That's the part that I believe most fans, especially those without leadership experience (or aren't competent leaders themselves), don't understand. To them, it's obvious. To the guys that share battles together, they need to see that this is going to be a clear upgrade and not a downgrade like it had been when they brought Sam on initially.

EDIT: Wanted to point out that the leadership comment wasn't targeting you. Was just a general observation.

there were other competitions that were decided before the QB one.  I'm fine with a technical one to open up camp.   It's the length.  When a competition becomes a fake one and then you rob someone of reps. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, CRA said:

there were other competitions that were decided before the QB one.  I'm fine with a technical one to open up camp.   It's the length.  When a competition becomes a fake one and then you rob someone of reps. 

 

Again though, we are looking at... what? An extra week of reps if announced before week 3? How many reps is the threshold?

Mondays are film days. Tuesdays are generally off days. Wednesdays and Thursdays are when the meat of those reps are gotten, and Fridays are often light with early outs. Saturdays are walk thrus. At best, we are looking at an extra two to four days worth of reps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SuperBowlBound Community Regular

SuperBowlBound

Posted
Posted

Considering the Panthers traded down multiple times in the 2nd round, giving Cleveland JOK & then passing on the best center in the draft in Creed Humphrey - yes, TMJ is a MASSIVE bust. The Twitter people that claim to be football experts but only look at Excel spreadsheets loved the pick. Just because the Twitter people love a pick doesn't mean he's any good. TMJ a massive bust so far. Am I still salty about how badly the Panthers whiffed on their OL in 2021? Damn right - because that problem compounded into this year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basbear
      Grading the Panthers' 2026 Draft Class

      By Basbear · Posted

      They know within 15 mins.  Many moons ago skins drafted Heath Shuler at like 5th overall and Gus Frerotte in the late rounds. You know the plan, its Heaths team. Old OLman stink said within 15 minutes they knew Gus was the better QB.  I didn't need 15 or players on the same field, I just knew like Bill said "he better walk on water", which he hasn't. I do blame tepper mainly for it, he spend the greater part of 2 year telling everyone Watson would be a panther......and fail....but a great fail...then Stanford turned panthers down.....tepper was beyond pissed and wanted a QB. He forced the trade and picked BY......and now by .....some grace of the gods formed a team with 4 QBs of no hope...... insane given the other roster spots.....
    • WUnderhill
      Grading the Panthers' 2026 Draft Class

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      He definitely knows nothing about the Panthers, but there’s no denying he’s a pioneer in this whole draft grading and mock draft field.
    • outlaw4
      Grading the Panthers' 2026 Draft Class

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
×
×
  • Create New...