Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we officially declare TMJ a bust?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Smith looks like a really exciting prospect and a guy we need to develop and involve more.  None of this can be said about TMJ. Did he get a jersey on Sunday? 

 

12 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

If he was on the field I missed it.  

What's crazy is they were showing him on the social media short vids like he was on the same level as DJ, Robbie, and CMAC. They showed him warming up with headphones making smooth catches from Baker in the endzone. Then I think I caught him in the frame once during game giving a five to Robbie on his touchdown. 

I was thinking we always get the defective toy. Chase and Jefferson out there beating double coverage and our guy the most formidable one on paper can't get on the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I was fine letting Baker compete in Spartanburg.  He did that.   Rhule carried it pointlessly long.  That's Matt Rhule. 

and when you carry a competition too long, one that clearly isn't actually a competition at some point.....everyone sees that too.   

The options weren't give him the job the day he signed the contract or run it all the way until the 4th preseason game. 

I don't necessarily agree. Training camp is nice and all, but that doesn't give them an opportunity to see how they prepare for and compete against other NFL opponents'. One game isn't enough of a sample size for that either, unless there is a huge discrepancy between the two (which, unfortunately, Baker didn't create enough of). Two games + the joint practices though gives plenty of data to make an educated decision and let their teammates experience it.

Could they have made the announcement before week 3? Sure. Is a week going to be the difference between a solid performance and a shitty one? Seeing as how even elite QBs struggled this week and the NFL has shown a tendency for the first few weeks of games to be sloppy after the practice changes instituted by the CBA, I personally don't think so.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, CRA said:

it's little things.  Like BC last year, Rhule painfully put him on the field when forced and argued against things with silly nonsense.  BC comes back this offseason with Rhule not really seeing him and suddenly Rhule now says he is one of our best guys that has to be on the field.  There was no real time for that narrative to change so quick.  It was obvious BC should of gotten more work last year and be even further along today than he is if he had.  And he looks like a promosing OL asset. 

Matt Rhule makes everything hard.  Giving Baker the job was easy.  He made it hard.  

100% agreed on all counts.

I had the same thought about BC after the reviews and grades came out after week 1.  Like, we all knew he should've been playing early last season, yet he didn't.  Not to say he would've been THIS good last season, as a rookie, but he damn sure looked close when he got the chances.  And it made me think of Elf and Boze now...  And how Kenny Robinson could go from PS/fringe roster guy to coming in at the end of last season and outplaying every safety not named Chinn.  Or how Burris was the penciled in starter for the last two years, and all of a sudden goes from that to being cut and out on the PS behind the guys that were backing him up for two years, but Rhule swore by him...  And that's why it makes any and everything so hard to evaluate under Rhule, like you said.  I think so much of his decisions are driven by ego and that "smartest guy in the room" garbage, and it's compounded now by job insecurity, so I don't think you ever get pure, untainted motives with him.  It's so obvious in so many of these cases the best guys aren't  playing, and if he isn't playing the best guys then how can we even fairly evaluate the guys that are out there or when they do get out there, as everything seems to be tainted with some sort of dysfunctional agenda?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Icege said:

 Two games + the joint practices though gives plenty of data to make an educated decision and let their teammates experience it.

Could they have made the announcement before week 3? Sure. Is a week going to be the difference between a solid performance and a shitty one? Seeing as how even elite QBs struggled this week and the NFL has shown a tendency for the first few weeks of games to be sloppy after the practice changes instituted by the CBA, I personally don't think so.

yeah, but Baker and Sam aren't unknowns.  There is a ton data to make an educated decision on that doesn't take up until the 4th preseason game to figure out.   That's another Rhule issue that consistently shows.   He struggles figuring out pretty obvious things.  Specifically, at QB but at a ton of spots.

and the elite QBs are textbook example of why reps and practice does matter going into a season.  Because even the elites that are largely protected don't look good going into a season without work.   A middle of the pack starter in a new system with all new players is going to need every rep he can get.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, but Baker and Sam aren't unknowns.  There is a ton data to make an educated decision on that doesn't take up until the 4th preseason game to figure out.   That's another Rhule issue that consistently shows.   He struggles figuring out pretty obvious things.  Specifically, at QB but at a ton of spots.

and the elite QBs are textbook example of why reps and practice does matter going into a season.  Because even the elites that are largely protected don't look good going into a season without work.   A middle of the pack starter in a new system with all new players is going to need every rep he can get.   

 

I'm with you on Baker clearly being better than Sam, no argument there.

However, in a team environment, he had to compete for the job. That's the part that I believe most fans, especially those without leadership experience (or aren't competent leaders themselves), don't understand. To them, it's obvious. To the guys that share battles together, they need to see that this is going to be a clear upgrade and not a downgrade like it had been when they brought Sam on initially.

EDIT: Wanted to point out that the leadership comment wasn't targeting you. Was just a general observation.

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Icege said:

I'm with you on Baker clearly being better than Sam, no argument there.

However, in a team environment, he had to compete for the job. That's the part that I believe most fans, especially those without leadership experience (or aren't competent leaders themselves), don't understand. To them, it's obvious. To the guys that share battles together, they need to see that this is going to be a clear upgrade and not a downgrade like it had been when they brought Sam on initially.

EDIT: Wanted to point out that the leadership comment wasn't targeting you. Was just a general observation.

there were other competitions that were decided before the QB one.  I'm fine with a technical one to open up camp.   It's the length.  When a competition becomes a fake one and then you rob someone of reps. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, CRA said:

there were other competitions that were decided before the QB one.  I'm fine with a technical one to open up camp.   It's the length.  When a competition becomes a fake one and then you rob someone of reps. 

 

Again though, we are looking at... what? An extra week of reps if announced before week 3? How many reps is the threshold?

Mondays are film days. Tuesdays are generally off days. Wednesdays and Thursdays are when the meat of those reps are gotten, and Fridays are often light with early outs. Saturdays are walk thrus. At best, we are looking at an extra two to four days worth of reps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the Panthers traded down multiple times in the 2nd round, giving Cleveland JOK & then passing on the best center in the draft in Creed Humphrey - yes, TMJ is a MASSIVE bust. The Twitter people that claim to be football experts but only look at Excel spreadsheets loved the pick. Just because the Twitter people love a pick doesn't mean he's any good. TMJ a massive bust so far. Am I still salty about how badly the Panthers whiffed on their OL in 2021? Damn right - because that problem compounded into this year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here’s a summary of the JJ and Luke podcast transcript. Opening / Bryce Young Fifth-Year Option     •    JJ: Breaking news — Panthers picked up Bryce Young’s fifth-year option at $25.9M, guaranteed, coming in 2027. Combined with his 2025 salary of ~$6M, that’s $31M over two years — called it a “no-brainer.”     •    Luke: Enthusiastic about the move. Highlighted Bryce’s improving TD/INT ratios (11/10 → 15/9 → 23/11) and the value of entering year three with Dave Canales. Noted $25M is a bargain relative to the $60M top of market. Luke’s Personal Update — Charlotte Christian Football     •    Luke: Working with Charlotte Christian school football program, which hired a new head coach. Coaches include Greg Olsen, Luke, and Greg’s dad Chris Olsen (a New Jersey State coaching Hall of Famer).     •    JJ: Jokingly quipped that Charlotte Christian’s coaching staff is “the world’s greatest” — a Fox analyst, a Hall of Famer, and the best Panthers RB ever — all coaching middle school football.     •    Luke: Praised Chris Olsen’s deep football knowledge spanning decades and his ability to connect with kids. Round 1, Pick 19 — Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia     •    JJ: Panthers were on the clock and submitted their pick almost immediately — a sign of confidence and preparation. Freeling is 6’7”, 320 lbs, played in the SEC in a pro-style system.     •    Luke: Loved the pick. Emphasized you can never have too many quality offensive linemen. Noted Freeling’s size, athleticism, and arm length as key traits. Said the pick also reflects team’s philosophy of drafting great people, not just great players.     •    JJ: Noted reporter Darren Gantt compared Freeling favorably to Jordan Gross — bigger, heavier, and faster — as a potential franchise left tackle.     •    Luke: Pointed out that young players like Freeling still have physical development ahead of them, comparing the trajectory to Christian McCaffrey’s growth from age 20 onward. Round 2, Pick 49 — Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech     •    JJ: Panthers traded up from 51 to 49 (pick swap with Minnesota) to grab Hunter. Played audio from Panthers area scout Kaden McLuhan, who scouted Hunter.     •    Scout Kaden McLuhan (audio): Said Hunter’s size is immediately striking, and that everyone around him spoke glowingly about his character, energy, and love for the game.     •    Luke: Praised Hunter as a massive (6’3”, 320 lbs, ~34” arms) two-gap nose tackle who fits perfectly in the Evero defense. Compared his prospect profile to Akiem Hicks. Said having Derek Brown, Bobby Brown, Derrick Brown, Terson Wharton, and now Hunter creates varied body types that stress offensive linemen.     •    JJ: Noted Hunter ranked third among all prospects in run-stuff rate and sixth in interior pass-rush win rate — addressing a perception that he couldn’t rush the passer. Rounds 3–7 Highlights     •    Luke: Highlighted WR Brazle (3rd round, 6’4”, 437 speed, 1,000+ yards at Tennessee) as the vertical threat the offense needed. Also praised OL Sam Heck (5th round) as a technically sound player whose “short arms” caused him to fall but who has proven himself.     •    Luke: Mentioned CB Will Lee (6’1”, 33” arms) fits the Panthers’ DB prototype — big, long corners.     •    Luke: Praised S/LB hybrid Zaki Wheatley (5th round, 6’3”) as a big nickel similar to Trayvon Merek.     •    Luke: Excited about the linebacker competition between Devin Lloyd, Trevvin Wallace, and Claudin Cherless.     •    JJ: Noted Panthers had the #1 “steal/overreach” rating in the entire draft — drafting players lower than consensus big boards projected. Around the League     •    Luke: Admitted being “a little jealous” that the Miami Dolphins drafted LB Jacob Rodriguez (Luke’s favorite LB in the draft). Has personal connections to Miami’s coaching staff (Jeff Hafley, DC Shawn Dugen — a childhood teammate).     •    Luke: Also noted Miami’s selection of OT/G Kaden Proctor out of Alabama, who will likely move to guard. League Trends — Bigger Tight Ends / 12 & 13 Personnel     •    JJ: Observed the NFL saw its highest run rate in ~11 years (~52%) and a notable pivot toward big blocking tight ends in this draft.     •    Luke: Explained the cyclical nature of NFL offense/defense evolution — as defenses get smaller to match spread offenses, teams counter with bigger personnel (12/13 formations), which then forces defenses to get bigger at the nickel/“big nickel” spot. Called it an ongoing arms race.
    • Dan Vladar is their best player and that is going to be the difference in the series 
×
×
  • Create New...