Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants: The Previous Game is Under Review


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

You mean that same Danny Dimes who was catching Passes against us last year 

we got the piss beat out of us last year by Joe Judge. Daboll is a better coach. 34-7 NYG

I disagree and I really dont think using a team's performance from last year should ever be a measuring stick for how they will perform the next year. ie Packers v Vikings ... last year 37-10 and this year 7-23. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I disagree and I really dont think using a team's performance from last year should ever be a measuring stick for how they will perform the next year. ie Packers v Vikings ... last year 37-10 and this year 7-23. 

Careful now, you'll upset the Huddle negativity.

Edited by 3838
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I skimmed the game and it's still strange to see the Giants running a lot of 3-4, but it looks different with Wink running it. The interior rush looks solid so I think Elf and guards will have a tougher game than last week, but Ikem and Moton should be able to hold up a lot better on the edges. Wink's scheme also relies on man coverage and the Giants CB's room isn't really built for that. So yes I agree with OP, attack the CB's, get CMC outside, Baker scrambling right like he likes to do might actually work a little bit better against this D than CLE. Very different D than last week outside of both of them having not great CB's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

I disagree and I really dont think using a team's performance from last year should ever be a measuring stick for how they will perform the next year. ie Packers v Vikings ... last year 37-10 and this year 7-23. 

Until this Sunday's game is played recent results still have relevancy and he played well against us and he's off to a nice start this season. Let's shut him down then trash talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jayflip said:

Thabkd @TheCasillasfantastic write up!

My only hope is that Rhule & co saw what you saw and will exploit the weaknesses you saw. Lol. 

I hope Rhule and the rest of the coaching staff are at least as capable of watching and breaking down film as our man TheCasillas here.  If not, we're in serious trouble. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...