Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does 0-2 put Rhule’s seat red hot?


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I may be proven wrong on Sunday but this year does have a 2001 feeling. I just hope it doesn’t end that way. Even though going 1-15 was strangely way more entertaining than the snooze fest that was 2-14 2010. 

What is sad is 01 and 10 would have still beat last years team.  That was some of thhheee worst panthers football around.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, CarolinaLivin said:

His seat should’ve been red hot to start the season, but Tepper is all in on winning 5 games for 7 straight years or whatever jay z did

Yanno what, I've been wanting to say this for a couple of years but figured it would piss people off. But here goes. fug Jay-Z.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NAS said:

I think if the Defense gets gashed again for 150+ yds on the ground, it will be Snow who falls on the sword first.  Rhule will have a few more games before he runs out of scapegoats.

I think Rhule is out of offensive scapegoats.   On 3rd QB and 2nd OC.  Him tossing anyone in the fire on O won’t silence any of the noise.   And he can’t bench his QB for relief because the next guy up is Sam. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

No, I don't think 0-2 puts Rhule on the hotseat. I've always felt he gets at least 4 years.

no NFL coach just gets 4-7 years.  You still have to earn it. 

the stadiums will empty, the season tickets they so want to bump the price on won't sell, etc. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, 3838 said:

Great class photo of the Huddle.

Yeah . .why can't they all be happy with consistently losing? Why can't they just be happy to have a team? Why do they have to keep complaining about losing? Why do they have to keep yelling to get rid of a coach that doesn't know how to win?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

no NFL coach just gets 4-7 years. 

No first time NFL coach gets the contract Tepper gave Rhule either. 🤷‍♂️

Tepper also seems to care more about the money despite his claiming he wants to win than actually winning and probably won't want to eat the majority of that contract even if he can wipe his butt with that sort of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

No first time NFL coach gets the contract Tepper gave Rhule either. 🤷‍♂️

Tepper also seems to care more about the money despite his claiming he wants to win than actually winning and probably won't want to eat the majority of that contract even if he can wipe his butt with that sort of money.

he only is going to eat all that money if Matt Rhule stays unemployed from coaching.   Which I don't think would happen.   Rhule clearly isn't a TV gig type of guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. But you do understand that there is no such thing as not signing free agents, right? That's what I mean. So make some good free agency moves and do well in the draft. That's step one. If you can't accomplish that, then this will just keep getting worse.
    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
×
×
  • Create New...