Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We improved the staff, so WTF is going on?


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

I’m looking at our 2021 staff and comparing it to our 2022 staff, and this is one reason I was expecting an improved product on the field. Better, more experienced coaches should equal better play.

So why aren’t we seeing results so far? Are the players not as good as we thought or are the coaches being hamstrung by Rhule?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

I’m looking at our 2021 staff and comparing it to our 2022 staff, and this is one reason I was expecting an improved product on the field. Better, more experienced coaches should equal better play.

So why aren’t we seeing results so far? Are the players not as good as we thought or are the coaches being hamstrung by Rhule?

The improvement on staff was largely exaggerated.  We got a solid ST coach.  That was the notable add. 

Wilks is a fine coach but he is just a position coach.  He isn’t going to really impact things if you got a weak DC and a horrible HC over him.  He doesn’t have power to really change anything. 

HC, DC and OC all stink.  It’s the worst trio in the entire NFL of the big 3 spots. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 4Corners said:

Ruhle is still head coach 

This.  Plain and simple.

As I've said in other threads, for all that has changed, what has remained the same and constant throughout it all?  Find it coincidental that the same struggles on both sides of the ball continue and look exactly the same as they did as year one, if not worse?  

Different personnel, different assistants, etc., and yet, the team plays just as bad...  

It's Matt Rhule.  That's it.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

I’m looking at our 2021 staff and comparing it to our 2022 staff, and this is one reason I was expecting an improved product on the field. Better, more experienced coaches should equal better play.

So why aren’t we seeing results so far? Are the players not as good as we thought or are the coaches being hamstrung by Rhule?

poo starts at the top... Fhule has final say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hepcat said:

We didn’t improve the staff. It’s a bunch of misfit reject NFL coaches and the remnants of Matt Rhule’s college staff 

How we got Tabor and Hekker to come here I have no clue, and Rhule nearly negates it by putting Chuba at kick returner. Everything else sucks, I don't think we can totally blame Wilks for secondary issues when Snow is running this backwards as poo at safety

 

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, yes, there is a difference between looking at a box score and watching film.  But PFF has a big subjective aspect to some of their grades.  That's how you get a 2/4 being better than 3/5 with a TD.  You aren't using stats at that point or factual events, but subjective analysis of plays.   And it's not like it is the same subjective analysis applying across all the players.   Same guy grading BY's incompletions (which are putting him over the top) isn't grading everyone else's incompletions and completions.  So it's different subjective takes/viewpoints applied.  There is no way everyone at PFF views grading out a play the same.  Then it all dumps into the same spreadsheet.  Hit the sort button.  Sometimes I feel it gets really weird and and collective data starts saying some weird stuff that just isn't true.   
    • Yeah, Sanders had a very nice debut preseason performance but the folks acting like he's arrived based on that performance are getting way out ahead of themselves.
    • I won't be surprised if Graham disappoints. Maybe not outright bust but never lives up to his draft status. The more I watched him at Michigan the more I came away impressed by the other Michigan DT. I think he might be the real player. Usually when you have two high level prospects in the same college unit one of them ends up getting fraud checked in the NFL as being largely carried by the other guy. Peppers and Ryan Sims at UNC comes to mind. Lavar Arrington and Courtney Brown at Penn State, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...