Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule and Tepper scheduled to meet at 1:30


Jai.
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

why?

 

Whats the point of that?  Might as well make rhule coach this through.  This season is done.

Yep, this season was lost last year when Rhule was retained. Even if he was fired last year we probably still suck this year because of the damage hes done though. If hes fired today it will take a couple of years to recover. Nice goin tepper.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Carolina Cajun said:

Its pretty toast, but with rhule at helm its guaranteed failure, bur might as well atleast try something else for the rest of the season.  there is talent on the roster

I asked yesterday but where is the talent on this roster?  What is our best position group?

 

I just dont understand firing rhule and promoting mcadoo to try and win a few games.  That does nothing.  We are basically out of the playoffs as it is might as well trot rhule out.  This is all his design

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hepcat said:

There’s 0 reason to fire Rhule now. The entire staff is his guys save for like 3 or 4 coaches. Firing him achieves nothing. The whole staff is unqualified to be coaching an NFL team. 

I tend to agree although we have seen interim coaches come in and do better, as recently as last year with the Raiders. Neither Wilks or McAdoo are Rhule guys and both have previous HC experience. Something like McAdoo HC with Snow and Rhule gone then promote Wilks to DC. I don't think there's a chance in hell regardless that we turn our season around but that would be better than what we've seen so far with Rhule and would be some progress. Plus then you have an early head start on the coaching search for next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

why?

 

Whats the point of that?  Might as well make rhule coach this through.  This season is done.

I wouldn't be mad at seeing if Wilks could be the guy.  He got a raw deal in AZ...  I think we will be worlds better with just dismissing Rhule and Snow, and I honestly don't really give a poo about his underlings beyond that.  I'm sure they'll follow, but we'll be fine.

That really is the best possible scenario for the rest of the year, because it's not like a Leftwich, Payton, or Flores is gonna come on mid-season, so may as well see what Wilks can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

it's like giving a fake hundo to a homeless man. uncommonly cruel given the desperation 

C’mon Philly, you’re better than this, been reading your posts since the old, old days.   Werent you on the charlotte observer forums before we got the huddle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...