Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical: What Happens Next?


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

I do not understand why everybody is clamoring for Wilkes to take over. He is shown he was ineffective as a head coach in Arizona. They fired him after one awful season. McAdoo is no better. Everyone thinks firing Rhule is some cure-all, but we would still be in terrible shape until next year. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joemac said:

There were, just not for the tanking allegations, I think. 

 

So both. But the article doesn't say which got exactly what. So there we go.

 

Owner Ross-Suspended 1st 6 games.

Draft picks lost-1st in 23 and a 4th in 24

Fines-1.5 million dollars

 

According to Yahoo Sports

NFL suspends Miami Dolphins owner and strips team of draft picks in tampering and tanking probe | CNN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ChuckWag78 said:

I do not understand why everybody is clamoring for Wilkes to take over. He is shown he was ineffective as a head coach in Arizona. They fired him after one awful season. McAdoo is no better. Everyone thinks firing Rhule is some cure-all, but we would still be in terrible shape until next year. 

 

It may not be a cure-all. But, for MANY fans, it would be a good start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChuckWag78 said:

I guess, it just seems like a move to make a move. Makes the franchise look very reactionary and hypersensitive.

 

I can see it both ways. Give the guy the rest of the season to see if this all finally comes together. Then again, sometimes you just have to say no more.

 

Plenty of Coaches get fired in season. If he has done a bad job, ppl will see it for what it is. At some point you just have to pull the plug.

 

Especially in this day and age. Instant gratification and short attention spans lead to unhappy fans. And that can lead to Anarchy. And nobody wants that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChuckWag78 said:

I do not understand why everybody is clamoring for Wilkes to take over. He is shown he was ineffective as a head coach in Arizona. They fired him after one awful season. McAdoo is no better. Everyone thinks firing Rhule is some cure-all, but we would still be in terrible shape until next year. 

No one thinks firing Rhule will be a cure-all. But it will hopefully start the healing. We will likely have a top 5 rookie QB and some already solid pieces on offense and defense. So the new coach won’t be starting from ground zero. 
Yes next year will be rough but if Rhules not here I’m fine with it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ChuckWag78 said:

I do not understand why everybody is clamoring for Wilkes to take over. He is shown he was ineffective as a head coach in Arizona. They fired him after one awful season. McAdoo is no better. Everyone thinks firing Rhule is some cure-all, but we would still be in terrible shape until next year. 

Yeah, I'm not sold on McAdoo as OC much less HC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ChuckWag78 said:

I do not understand why everybody is clamoring for Wilkes to take over. He is shown he was ineffective as a head coach in Arizona. They fired him after one awful season. McAdoo is no better. Everyone thinks firing Rhule is some cure-all, but we would still be in terrible shape until next year. 

Some believe that a change in defensive philosophy would make a huge impact on the success of this team. The 3-3 is just not generating enough pressure on 3rd downs. If we could win 40% of the 3rd down battles we would be undefeated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's the thing with the Panthers. Your average NFL coaching roster has guys that have been part of several coaching staffs. Ours has several guys that have followed Matt Rhule around for a pretty significant part of their careers.

The longest tenured Rhule loyalists...

DC Phil Snow (of course)

DB Coach Evan Cooper

LB Coach Mike Siravo

RB Coach Jeff Nixon

Assistant ST Coach Ed Foley

S&C Coach Jeremy Scott

The good news? Most of those guys are either non-essential or fairly replaceable. For example, Wilks can likely take over DC duties while still coaching the secondary, Al Holcomb can handle the linebackers and other assistants who stick can shift duties to cover what we need.

Not like we're losing anybody that's world class or anything...

That's why I've said that if Rhule was gone today we wouldn't be any less prepared Sunday. Maybe more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...