Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Great Podcast with Jonathan Stewart


d-dave
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

He said that? When?

 

Was this part of that “Snow runs the show and Rhule is his puppet” Twitter thread?

There is no way he said that to a legit source.  Even if he believed it he wouldn't want the players knowing it.  Also why would he take this job knowing that??  Surely he researched the team before he took the job.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Burnout189 said:

The coaches evaluate the talent and the game plan for each week. It's up to the players to execute that game plan to the best of their ability. But if the game plan sucks to begin with, not to mention the talent level of the players being put out there by the coaches to execute said plan is severely lacking, then well, you're gonna have a bad time.

And if you have a bunch of young players trying to learn the NFL game from coaches who don’t know the NFL game then…..

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I listen to Locked On occasionally but the host is, or was(?), a Rhule supporter so listening to him can sometimes be a frustration. 
Dude constantly makes excuses for Rhule. 
 

That is laughable. He is always very open to not truly believing in Rhule. He, unlike you and others, bring up points that are beyond his control, and a view point that regardless that he feels like Rhule is gone no.matter what, that Rhule should have through to the end of season, which is what a patient perspective is. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

That is laughable. He is always very open to not truly believing in Rhule. He, unlike you and others, bring up points that are beyond his control, and a view point that regardless that he feels like Rhule is gone no.matter what, that Rhule should have through to the end of season, which is what a patient perspective is. 

Not from what I have heard from listening to him. 
He makes constant excuses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that execution is on the coaches. If they can't find the right people. It's on the coaches. If things break down it's on the coaches. Yes players have to make it work but if you can't get them to do that and hold players accountable you're not a good coach. Both Rivera and Fox always had a defense that would battle and was prepared. It's because of their background and understanding what needed to happen to win on defense. The problem was they both needed a OC that was just as good and the understanding of how to control the game as a HC. The sheer fact that Matt Rhule has traded for all these second tier QBs shows how he doesn't understand the NFL. You have to have a starting QB to win games and make the playoffs. It's not a maybe it's a yes we need that. But at the same time you have to have the coaching ability to develop that player too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lack of identity?  That is 1000% on the coaches.  (And JStew is right)

Players not sure of their assignment?  That's on the coaches.  (Once again, correct)

Even the part about needing that veteran leadership?  That's on the coaches and FO staff.  (Yep again)

I understand the coaches can't play the game for the players, but when so many things are wrong, it does need to go back to the person in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

There is no way he said that to a legit source.  Even if he believed it he wouldn't want the players knowing it.  Also why would he take this job knowing that??  Surely he researched the team before he took the job.

I read that entire thread from C3 and don't remember any mention of Wilks saying anything like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I still contend no well run team would have him on the roster next year.  You got to move on from him.  And you can't put the #1 overall pick, 3 year starter as the backup...that creates horrific in house dynamics. 
    • I do think there is a win/lose aspect he is presently in with his QB situation.   Let's say he does some really good Steve Wilks play ugly to win coaching......with a really ugly game plan beats SF (which we could have), gets New Orleans, and a Tampa game.  Completely minimizes Bryce Young.  well, that would have put him at 9-8 on the season.   And then......Bryce Young is going nowhere.  Maybe Morgan replaces Dalton but the Bryce conundrum gets even worse.  Now you go that 5th year.  and we know Bryce is going to get unfair credit.  He already gets absurd credit for anything that goes okay.  you are to an extent damned if you do if you are Canales IMO.   I want them all gone.  I just don't think Tepper can get the hire.  I think the only way Tepper can get a good hire....is to give a decent coach way more power than Tepper would like.  
    • As a general optimist who tries to be even handed, I was in the “I have hope” but it’s now gone category.  I acknowledged that the bad games were more frequent than the OK ones which were in turn more frequent than the good ones. I just held out hope that he could put things together and more consistently perform at those mid and higher levels. But I’m off that train now. I think he can probably improve his consistency a bit from where he is, but it’ll never be good enough. He’s on the roster next year because he’s under contract, but I don’t think we should pick up his 5th year option and definitely not extend him. He may start next year too because there genuinely are not as many competent QBs as there are starting spots in the league, so the alternatives are all trash. But we’ve got to get fresh blood in the QB room and find our next starter. 
×
×
  • Create New...