Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Saints at Panthers GameDay Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Baker Mayfield with less than 50 yards passing for the first half against a team with a beaten up Jameis Winston. I've given him a chance but it's time to take the gloves off. He is slightly better than Sam Darnold and that is only because he doesn't throw as many horrific interceptions but even that could change as the season goes on. Can't believe this man talked all that junk and even sold those shirts. Forty four passing yards!?

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Yeah, my issue with Baker has been missing the throws that are open and not throwing it away when the play is dead...  but, the problem is, there is rarely anyone open, the opponent seems to always know what we're running before we run it and have it locked up, and aside from them knowing the plays, the playcalls themselves just have no rhythm...  nothing is setting anything else up.  It's bad.

Yep. Baker missed two throws on that one drive and they were crucial misses on relatively easy throws but this overall offensive design is trash for our personnel. I have no idea why you hire an OC who thinks RBs can't be used in the passing game when your best player is the best pass catching RB in the NFL. And hiring an OC who heavily relied on TEs when that's probably the weakest position group on the entire roster.

It's just a square peg/round hole. The same thing is true on the other side of the ball. We have built a good young core of CBs but they're press man CBs. Why do you hire Steve Wilks as your secondary coach when he's a cover 3 guy? We have our press man CBs playing soft zone 10 yards off the LOS. Again, square peg/round hole.

Rhule went hiring names to impress Tepper with former NFL HCs on his staff. He didn't even bother to try to hire guys who could maximize his roster.

 

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, carpanfan96 said:

I mean don't get me wrong baker has been bad, really bad... but I can't fathom any qb looking good in this offense behind this line

I think a lot of it too are the schemes and baker’s depth on rollouts 

he also over threw open receivers and had drops

thats why I have said run the ball to get positive yardage and let it be more manageable 

If mcadoo runs one more of those lateral scenes, going to vomit

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, raleigh-panther said:

I think a lot of it too are the schemes and baker’s depth on rollouts 

he also over threw open receivers and had drops

thats why I have said run the ball to get positive yardage and let it be more manageable 

If mcadoo runs one more of those lateral scenes, going to vomit

...its his ace in the hole...that he uses every series...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...