Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What sort of offense are we running?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

There are a couple things this offense is missing that are pretty easy fixes. 
 

CMC option routes. These would help baker so much. They are quick developing and big plays can come from them. 
 

Deep Shots:  probably more an indicator of the lack of trust in the oline but we need to start taking some over the top shots. 
 

Ricci:  he needs to get more action in the passing game. Playaction plays to him in the flat would be a good look for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know they dumped the RPO this last game and it was 80% of the O the first 2. 

I dont have a good feel what Benny boy is trying/doing....I know some of his background via GB, NYG, and dallas.....

Look around the league and around half the league is a struggle city on O. Most of us have seen the first three games, and guess what 20.7 is good for the 12th rank......NFL has sucked for points this year thus far...indy is at 13.3.....weird

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this metric account for time added through scrambling, roll-outs, and extending the play? 

Seems that the clean pocket time referenced against timing in vacating the pocket would be more telling where that time is coming from - good or bad protection, Mayfield's necessary scrambling vs premature bailing, and so on. 

1 hour ago, jackson113 said:

FB_IMG_1664318030424.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I know they dumped the RPO this last game and it was 80% of the O the first 2. 

I dont have a good feel what Benny boy is trying/doing....I know some of his background via GB, NYG, and dallas.....

Look around the league and around half the league is a struggle city on O. Most of us have seen the first three games, and guess what 20.7 is good for the 12th rank......NFL has sucked for points this year thus far...indy is at 13.3.....weird

We are struggling to move the ball though.   We are 30th in O right now.  And our yards per game at this rate would have finished 32nd last year.   Even worse than the Sam season. 

got the freaking Jags averaging 100 more yards a game than us. 

we have a coaching problem in Carolina 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CRA said:

We are struggling to move the ball though.   We are 30th in O right now.  And our yards per game at this rate would have finished 32nd last year.   Even worse than the Sam season. 

got the freaking Jags averaging 100 more yards a game than us. 

we have a coaching problem in Carolina 

No question there are clear issues with the passing O. The  D passing, D running(checkout those first 3 RBs.....need a break PLS), STs all areas, and O running.......decent enough and good enough. The lone single issue is passing. Great thing they have DJ, anderson, and CMC....if there was a serve lack of talent...Id be more worried. 

Plus I know my focus can only be panthers, Ive been shocked at the scores on the ticker across the bottom watching panthers game. They are not alone in o struggles, again about half the league is currently.....

Do for sure need more plays too, I think they averaging 55??? You need close to 70, imo. But mainly score and limit TOs, the other stuff is far behind those two..

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

There's been a lot of commentary from local media analysts about the lack of motion in our offense. It seems to be a surprise to them.  If you look back at the Giants when he was OC you don't see it either. Did anyone consider looking at his tendencies and scheme?

https://youtu.be/flOz0SUT6DY

Back when Matt Rhule wasn’t deemed a lameduck/hotseat/bad coach….Rhule didn’t even think McAdoo was good enough to be his QB coach. 

reality is, when Rhule went OC searching, no one good would want to come for what looked like a one year gig for a bad coach/team. 

we hired a bad OC because we couldn’t get a good one. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pakmeng said:

There's been a lot of commentary from local media analysts about the lack of motion in our offense. It seems to be a surprise to them.  If you look back at the Giants when he was OC you don't see it either. Did anyone consider looking at his tendencies and scheme?

https://youtu.be/flOz0SUT6DY

Motion is on the quarterback used primarily to identify Man or Zone. If Baker already know weather its man or zone then no need to motion

Edited by SammyFranchise
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, SammyFranchise said:

Motion is on the quarterback used primarily to identify Man or Zone. If Baker already know weather its man or zone then no need to motion

Motion is also used to cause extra steps for the defense. It adds to the probability of a miscommunication. 
 

Anything you can do to make a defender think is a plus. You want to create uncertainty and discomfort. If they have to process and think, it slows their reaction. Even at this level. 
 

And if you can create just one miscommunication, it could lead to a blown play, and 6 fuging points. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...