Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official 49ers at Panthers GameDay Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Rhule just said "We didn't have to do silent count" so the 49ers crowd wasn't a factor LOL

 

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Didn't have to do silent count at home. Good for you 

 

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Good gravy 😖

You should probaby be aware that traveling fans cause teams around the league to have to use silent counts at home... ie: today's game in LA

 

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2022/10/07/sean-mcvay-rams-may-need-to-use-silent-count-at-home-with-big-cowboys-crowd-in-l-a/

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

 

 

You should probaby be aware that traveling fans cause teams around the league to have to use silent counts at home... ie: today's game in LA

 

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2022/10/07/sean-mcvay-rams-may-need-to-use-silent-count-at-home-with-big-cowboys-crowd-in-l-a/

You can't seriously compare Los Angeles and Charlotte as far as opposing fan bases showing up or actually having devoted hometown fans

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

You can't seriously compare Los Angeles and Charlotte as far as opposing fan bases showing up or actually having devoted hometown fans

I am comparing 49ers fans with Cowboys fans traveling for away games.... In all honesty LA football fans is probably the equivalent of Panther fans now that you bring that topic up. lol. LA had to implment a policy last year that LA ticket holders were not allowed to sell their tickets to 49ers fans. If you remember that whole poo show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

 

 

You should probaby be aware that traveling fans cause teams around the league to have to use silent counts at home... ie: today's game in LA

 

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2022/10/07/sean-mcvay-rams-may-need-to-use-silent-count-at-home-with-big-cowboys-crowd-in-l-a/

Charlotte is a transplant city.  Lots of people moving here.  Talking to the other tailgaters, most are transplants who support their former home team.   The fact that we suck is just making a bad situation worse.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, poundaway said:

Charlotte is a transplant city.  Lots of people moving here.  Talking to the other tailgaters, most are transplants who support their former home team.   The fact that we suck is just making a bad situation worse.

yeah, we dont have a good fan base here when it comes to the NFL. The Hornets its a different story, but thats due to them being in the league now for multiple generations.  

 

We are really onyl one true generation in for the Carolina Panthers. Prior to that this was 49ers, Redskin and Cowboy country, wth some steelers fans. We havent grown out of that fan base yet.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...