Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL: Pats relationship with Mac Jones "gone sideways"


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

i've been kind of wondering why they have a defensive coach as the OC as well.

it's like they want to pretend that there isn't an offense after losing brady.

i mean i don't want us chasing after mac even if he's better than anyone we've got on the roster. kid is a punk and not the talented kind that makes it ok.

but he's not wrong. belichick is doing some nutty things recently with that team.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rayzor said:

i've been kind of wondering why they have a defensive coach as the OC as well.

it's like they want to pretend that there isn't an offense after losing brady.

i mean i don't want us chasing after mac even if he's better than anyone we've got on the roster. kid is a punk and not the talented kind that makes it ok.

but he's not wrong. belichick is doing some nutty things recently with that team.

Belichick seems to subscribe to the old Jerry Richardson notion that if they were good at one thing, they'll be equally good at another.

Never really been a big fan of that idea...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

i've been kind of wondering why they have a defensive coach as the OC as well.

it's like they want to pretend that there isn't an offense after losing brady.

i mean i don't want us chasing after mac even if he's better than anyone we've got on the roster. kid is a punk and not the talented kind that makes it ok.

but he's not wrong. belichick is doing some nutty things recently with that team.

They are a top 4ish team now in the AFC.  They are doing something right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Jones is incredibly limited. Do not want and I love to see it but he isn't even the best QB up there now. Anyone that says we should go get him obviously didn't learn anything the last 3 years.

The same can be said for all of the other QBs from the “vaunted” 2021 QB class. I’m very down on things but the one thing they got right was passing on Fields & Jones and not selling the farm for Wilson or Lance. At this time - I’m not sold on Young (size, frame) or Stroud (Ohio State QBs don’t translate as they cannot read the field) for 2023. 

Edited by SuperBowlBound
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We have our own issues with Bryce but it’s crazy how this franchise was dragged through the media the last 2 years for missing out on CJ Stroud and Caleb Williams   *whispers* Bryce played better than both of them in the playoffs the real mistake was mortgaging the future for Bryce when Drake Maye could have been there the next year
    • This board has a meltdown over literally everything. It means nothing.
    • O-line: 1 major player for Tackle (draft or FA) and a Center (if we don't resign Mayes). WR: Low pick or good FA signing? D-LIne: Def need a NT and a DE/OLB who can rush the QB. FA or Draft? TE; I don't know what they want to think of what they do? MLB: I think it's out 1st rd pick, but getting another in FA wouldn't hurt, thoughts? DBs; We need another sticky QB to play more man when needed. Again a 1st or 2nd rd pick IMO.  S: Everybody says we need a rangy centerfielder, draft or FA? Would you take one high in the draft? I don't use players because there are no guarantees who's there, just asking what makes sense. We know they'll fill "all" the holes in FA and then draft, so which FA are the better ones and which are just 1 year fillers? My thought: FA - Big DT, DE/OLB & MLB. 2 of 3 as those take a which to develop. Draft: MLB or Tackle, DB in the 2nd, DE/OLB in the 3rd. I think they need a solid T if Icki doesn't return better than before and Moton is getting old.  I also think thy need to resign BC on the O-line.  
×
×
  • Create New...