Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we have Pro Bowlers on this roster?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would say ‘locks’ for this team are 

 

Hekker- has been a great punter for this team, good accuracy and plenty of leg

 Brown- has to be one of the top interior DL in the league. Playing VERY well and has shed the bust label

 

maybe category

Ekwonu- this young man has a very bright future, he’s playing at a high level as a rookie

Burns- sacks will have to pick up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheBigKat said:

I would say ‘locks’ for this team are 

 

Hekker- has been a great punter for this team, good accuracy and plenty of leg

 Brown- has to be one of the top interior DL in the league. Playing VERY well and has shed the bust label

 

maybe category

Ekwonu- this young man has a very bright future, he’s playing at a high level as a rookie

Burns- sacks will have to pick up

Burns has 5 sacks in 7 games.  That pace will be a career high for the (already been to the) pro-bowler.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Killah_Ray said:

Hekker, Brown, and Burns look like good bets.

 

Only one I'm iffy on is Brown and that's only because he isn't a well known name I feel like amongst casual fans...

2-5 teams don’t have pro bowlers. Every one stop with the homer bullshit.  The worst team in the league and some of y’all are saying 3-4 players?? Hahahahaha. What in the actual fug. Good teams rarely get 3 much less 4. 
 

y’all get one win and to think we have the best players 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

maybe burns. Mayyybe. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CJ Allen is also in that gaggle of LBs after Styles.
    • A team should do everything they can to prop up their investment in a QB regardless of who it is. 
    • I am not wanting to be too judgemental of Morgan over his first draft given the circumstances.  People don’t like my rationale but you know, I don’t so much like theirs either.  I was adamantly against drafting Bryce and very resentful over the extreme (imo) measures taken to prop him up. I feel like Dan got caught in that trap with demands or conditions placed on him to help out the QB and the new Offensive minded head coach.  And my biased opinion is that it was still all Bryce centric. Micro managed and solely focused on making him a viable player after his first disastrous season. Mandated to help the offense in that draft.  I feel like my speculation is reasonable given the climate and situation, and it includes the reasons we didn’t take a C, the reasons we overdrafted a RB and that particular WR. It was totally need based. Perceived needs. All to maximize Bryce.    And if it were me, and I wanted the GM slot of my team that I came up with, I would be willing to accede to the agenda that I feel was in place. The goals he had to meet.  It is pretty simple, just put Bryce’s needs at the center of everything that was done and work your way through it.  I have no idea or inside info, and people have mocked my opinion for it but that is what it is, it still makes sense to me. 
×
×
  • Create New...