Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Finding a QB is hard


Martin
 Share

Recommended Posts

There's something to be said for giving a QB time to settle into the O and get in sync with the receivers.  Josh Allen wasn't very good his first year out.

We've seen Teddy's best performance and Sam's and Bakers worst.

Would Teddy had played better with another year in the O?  Maybe.

Would Sam had been better with the new OL?  Maybe. 

Would Baker improve as McAdoo figures it out and he gets in sync with the WR's?  Maybe.

Its PJ's show now until he lets it go. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

One other thing I'd throw in on this topic...

Don't always be looking for "the next" whomever.

I know a lot of Panther fans love the idea of finding the next Cam Newton, but you also have to realize that player may not be out there in the current draft pool. And even if they are, would they be compatible with the kind of scheme our new head coach wants to run?

Plus, just frankly, when you're looking for a clone of someone you liked in the past, You are by definition limiting your choices and may end up missing someone who could be just as good even if they're not the same style.

Just stick to trying to find someone who can win in the NFL, whatever style of player they might be.

Maybe some people are saying that literally, but when I say it (and I assume when others say it) they are actually saying “franchise QB with elite traits.”

 

Cam was huge, fast, had a cannon, looked dominant in the SEC.

 

So people are questioning if that kind of guy is in this upcoming draft, in whatever form of play style the player might have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since 2005, it is very rare that you find a franchise QB with 1 of the top 5 picks.

2005 - Alex Smith Pick #1

2006 - Vince Young #3

2007 - Jamarcus Russell #1

2008 - Matt Ryan #3

2009 - Matt Stafford #1, Mark Sanchez #5

2010 - Sam Bradford #1

2011 - Cam Newton #1

2012 - Andrew Luck #1, RGIII #2

2014 - Blake Bortles #3

2015 - Jameis Winston #1, Marcus Mariota #2

2016 - Jared Goff #1, Carson Wentz #2

2017 - Mitch Trubinsky #2

2018 - Baker Mayfield #1, Sam Darnold #3

2019 - Kyler Murray #1

2020 - Joe Burrow #1, Tua Tugovailoa #3

2021 - Trevor Lawrence #1, Zack Wilson #2, Trey Lance #3

 

If we go by analytics then you don’t pick a QB in the top 5 picks. Lesson is don’t tank for a QB.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

One other thing I'd throw in on this topic...

Don't always be looking for "the next" whomever.

I know a lot of Panther fans love the idea of finding the next Cam Newton, but you also have to realize that player may not be out there in the current draft pool. And even if they are, would they be compatible with the kind of scheme our new head coach wants to run?

Plus, just frankly, when you're looking for a clone of someone you liked in the past, You are by definition limiting your choices and may end up missing someone who could be just as good even if they're not the same style.

Just stick to trying to find someone who can win in the NFL, whatever style of player they might be.

PJ "ALLIDOISWIN" WALKER 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Swirly said:

Since 2005, it is very rare that you find a franchise QB with 1 of the top 5 picks.

2005 - Alex Smith Pick #1

2006 - Vince Young #3

2007 - Jamarcus Russell #1

2008 - Matt Ryan #3

2009 - Matt Stafford #1, Mark Sanchez #5

2010 - Sam Bradford #1

2011 - Cam Newton #1

2012 - Andrew Luck #1, RGIII #2

2014 - Blake Bortles #3

2015 - Jameis Winston #1, Marcus Mariota #2

2016 - Jared Goff #1, Carson Wentz #2

2017 - Mitch Trubinsky #2

2018 - Baker Mayfield #1, Sam Darnold #3

2019 - Kyler Murray #1

2020 - Joe Burrow #1, Tua Tugovailoa #3

2021 - Trevor Lawrence #1, Zack Wilson #2, Trey Lance #3

 

If we go by analytics then you don’t pick a QB in the top 5 picks. Lesson is don’t tank for a QB.

That list doesn't help your argument

Trevor, Zack, Burrow, Cam, Luck, Stafford, Ryan, Smith are all franchise guys

Kyler, Tua probably are

Goff solid QB

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're going to win the division with 6 games, get blown out in the playoffs, and get right back to the quarterback purgatory loop.

If we do, I think Tepper will keep Wilks as the head coach, but really as just a foil for next year.

We're in the cycle.

  • Lose, but not quite enough.
  • Pick top 10.
  • Draft anything but a quarterback, until your hand is forced.
  • Lose, but not quite enough.

We're the new Jets.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

That list doesn't help your argument

Trevor, Zack, Burrow, Cam, Luck, Stafford, Ryan, Smith are all franchise guys

Kyler, Tua probably are

Goff solid QB

 A franchise player is one of the best players on the team that you can build around. Most of those QB's aren't. I'm not looking for a solid player in the top 5 picks. I want someone that other teams fear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Swirly said:

Since 2005, it is very rare that you find a franchise QB with 1 of the top 5 picks.

2005 - Alex Smith Pick #1

2006 - Vince Young #3

2007 - Jamarcus Russell #1

2008 - Matt Ryan #3

2009 - Matt Stafford #1, Mark Sanchez #5

2010 - Sam Bradford #1

2011 - Cam Newton #1

2012 - Andrew Luck #1, RGIII #2

2014 - Blake Bortles #3

2015 - Jameis Winston #1, Marcus Mariota #2

2016 - Jared Goff #1, Carson Wentz #2

2017 - Mitch Trubinsky #2

2018 - Baker Mayfield #1, Sam Darnold #3

2019 - Kyler Murray #1

2020 - Joe Burrow #1, Tua Tugovailoa #3

2021 - Trevor Lawrence #1, Zack Wilson #2, Trey Lance #3

 

If we go by analytics then you don’t pick a QB in the top 5 picks. Lesson is don’t tank for a QB.

All this tells us is that teams that are picking in the top 5 have missed the boat in either selecting their QB or developing them. You could do this same exercise for just about every other position and find similar results. 

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...