Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Theoretical: Matt Ryan


Jaxel
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, YourLastThought said:

Can't stand Matt Ryan so not only no but HELL NO. That asshole poos his damn pants on the field when he gets sacked. Can you imagine eveytime he was sacked our guys getting poo all over them from being around him in the huddle. That washed up nasty smug mouthed prick can go piss up a rope.

200.gif

Kinda ironic the gif you posted is Ryan melting down while having his ass kicked by a 17/20 for 216 yards, and 3 TDs Baker Mayfield with almost a perfect QBR.  Hahaha. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the first part of your scenario, pft had a write up about Ryan's contract and how that was the real determiner in benching him for the rest of the year once it was decided he didn't have it anymore.

No sympathy at all for Ryan from me, but the Colts kind of exacerbated any wear and tear going on in the arm immediately with the number of attempts they had him taking per game.

To the second part of your post, if he was signed I would put the Panthers back on boycott similar to the end of the Fox era when we were the dumbest team in the NFL. No games, no merch, no money spent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jaxel said:

But the idea of him playing twice against the falcons intrigues no one? I think it would be hilarious.

That’d likely mean us losing to the Falcons in both cases, which I doubt would strike anyone as particularly funny.

Ryan was benched for good reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...