Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big WR


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, frankw said:

It's nice to have a taller receiver but it isn't a necessity anymore. Besides we tried this with the likes of Benjamin and Funchess and both ultimately proved to be useless.

Agreed. If you look at the top 10 redzone offenses in the NFL this year, only 2 of them have a big boy receiver.  Those two teams are ATL and Dallas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Make them throw in pitts for good measure 

I mean if we are going to take on their last 2 first rounders, they better give us next year's first as well... bc they are goin to get expensive. 

 

I guess we will give them Elfein and Hartsfield to make the deal even for both teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big bodies... I think they've shifted that to the TEs across the league. With WRs being primarily quicker/faster and shifty. Bigger dudes usually have a problem with routes which leads to a difficulty seperating. 

ATL has Pitts who "should" be an absolute monster in the redzone yet he only had a couple TDs on the year going into yesterday  

We also have TE's for that. Specifically one which is 6'4 and currently being paid an obscene amount of money for the skillset he offers. I can't even picture Ian high pointing a ball. Sullivan & to a lesser extent Tremble I can see, however.

TMJ is what I expected to be our redzone threat since we drafted him. At LSU that certainly was the case. He definitely has the physicality and hands for it. You can tell we've been practicing to make him more of a factor. One could argue he would have caught both balls if the placement was slightly different. 

Either way I like where we're heading in that regard. Redzone/short distance has been problematic for this team for a minute... and tbh, Cam and JStew bailed us out ALOT in the past. Funchess wasnt consistent but he was our last true "redzone threat" at WR...iirc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

How about using that 6'4" Tommy Tremble guy?

https://www.mockdraftable.com/player/terrace-marshall

https://www.mockdraftable.com/player/tommy-tremble

Athletically, Marshal is your go to for jump balls. Longer arms, and higher verticals. Not to mention a better catcher. TBF, Terrace did catch that 2nd, just not in bounds.... a better placed ball and its a TD.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be a fun strategy to follow up our QB R1 pick with a top TE or WR.  We finally have a OL so maybe go after the receiving dudes to pair with him.

Looking at Michael Mayer TE Notre Dammit or Quentin Johnson WR TCU

Although I do love Jordan Addison WR as just a playmaker WR.  Could just get our QB, trade up for Addison and call it an offense.  He's been the best WR in college football for 2 years now.  Just a mad man.  

Stroud/Young +Addison a pray to thee football gods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

https://www.mockdraftable.com/player/terrace-marshall

https://www.mockdraftable.com/player/tommy-tremble

Athletically, Marshal is your go to for jump balls. Longer arms, and higher verticals. Not to mention a better catcher. TBF, Terrace did catch that 2nd, just not in bounds.... a better placed ball and its a TD.

I agree, but I guess that the passes looked kinda forced. That may have been because on those types of passes, you certainly need precise ball placement, and I'm not certain that P.J. has that in him which just frustrates the hell out of me because they tried the same play at least twice if not three times. I would've liked to see them have Tremble sell the block, then release quickly and go to the  endzone to create some space like Greg used to do. It wouldn't have required such a high degree of accuracy and more in line with P.J.'s skill set. 

Don't mind me though; I'm just still frustrated over the loss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NorthTryon said:

True, Buffalo is up there with their lot of 5'9 and 5'10" WRs running circles around people in the end zone. Gettleman and his damn basketball team strategy at WR cost us Devin Adams and Stephon Diggs. 

And this thread is noodles, two better throws and that's two TDs to Marshall.

Gabe Davis is a freak athlete in Buffalo.   TMJ. is gonna develop into a very good WR. we just need patience.  also Shenault is a big bodied guy Shi Smith has potential too.  Not opposed to adding a big guy soon but not a priority IMO.  I actually would prefer a sure handed smaller guy and scat back who can catch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

I mean if we are going to take on their last 2 first rounders, they better give us next year's first as well... bc they are goin to get expensive. 

 

I guess we will give them Elfein and Hartsfield to make the deal even for both teams.

Hey, we have to high first round QBs we can throw in in return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...