Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rams Offering Two (Future) Firsts for Burns

OnlyPantherFaninMaine

By OnlyPantherFaninMaine,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Snake said:

The FO is idiots for not pulling the trigger. 2 firsts is more than enough compensation for a guy we will have to pay next year. 

Not to mention that I honestly think the Rams will stink next year and the year after that. So those two firsts has a high possibility that they end up being high firsts.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peon Awesome Experienced

Peon Awesome

Posted
Posted

Until we get final confirmation on the specifics of the offer, it's hard to fully criticize it. We've heard it was going to be two future 1sts rather than any in the upcoming draft. Then we hear Cam Akers was getting added, which is probably a net negative overall. Who know what else was included? Did the Rams ask us to give them one of our 2023 2nds, similar to the Khalik Mack trade? Or hell, maybe they wanted us to give 2nds in 2024 and 2025 so that we were just moving up 1 round in those drafts. These leaks may have had an agenda, otherwise why leak it? I'm sure there were hundreds of offers around the league and this was one of the only rejected ones publicized. Maybe the Panthers leaked it to try to get a team to give 2 1sts with fewer strings attached. Or maybe it really was just 2 1sts and Akers. It'd just be nice to get some official confirmation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Wundrbread33 said:

@mrcompletely11 still waiting for an answer, or at least why you said “it doesn’t work like that.”

 

You dont trade for picks straight up.  If someone approached wanting that 2nd then they would to have to make it worth our while, which in most cases is additional pick(s).  Its never a 1:1 trade

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Growl said:

Wow so like your entire belief system is predicated on unquantifiable information, it’s almost impressive

It wouldnt be hard to surmise that a million nfl star that is on the cusp of an amazing payday would want to go to a competent franchise in Los Angeles rather then this clown show he has experienced here in charlotte. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

I’m not sure what your problem with me is, but it’s pretty bizarre. And I can assure you that I know I’m not the most knowledgeable person on this board. As for most interesting? Your immature responses tells me you are too young to even know what my name is referencing. Cheers.

Funny. Thanks for calling me young. I rarely get that comment since I retired....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wundrbread33 Grand Master

Wundrbread33

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You dont trade for picks straight up.  If someone approached wanting that 2nd then they would to have to make it worth our while, which in most cases is additional pick(s).  Its never a 1:1 trade

Absolutely.

If someone wanted this years 2nd, they would have to trade next years 2nd and 3rd, or 2nd 4th 5th, or next years…1st. 
 

Therefore…you actually agree with the opposing view that you have argued against for pages.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Absolutely.

If someone wanted this years 2nd, they would have to trade next years 2nd and 3rd, or 2nd 4th 5th, or next years…1st. 
 

Therefore…you actually agree with the opposing view that you have argued against for pages.

Thats some........interesting logic you are using right there

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It wouldnt be hard to surmise that a million nfl star that is on the cusp of an amazing payday would want to go to a competent franchise in Los Angeles rather then this clown show he has experienced here in charlotte. 

what are you talking about, Moore has already signed his contract 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wundrbread33 Grand Master

Wundrbread33

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Thats some........interesting logic you are using right there

You literally just said that you wouldn’t accept next years 2nd for this years 2nd because they would have to make the trade “worth our while.”

 

Why does a team have to make it “worth our while?”

 

It’s because we could select a player right there to help our team right now, versus waiting a year to draft a player in the same round.

 

Thats why you demand either more picks, or a future pick in a higher round. 
 

What’s interesting about the logic, is how you can agree and disagree with it at the same time. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

You literally just said that you wouldn’t accept next years 2nd for this years 2nd because they would have to make the trade “worth our while.”

 

Why does a team have to make it “worth our while?”

 

It’s because we could select a player right there to help our team right now, versus waiting a year to draft a player in the same round.

 

Thats why you demand either more picks, or a future pick in a higher round. 
 

What’s interesting about the logic, is how you can agree and disagree with it at the same time. 

charlie-day-its-always-sunny-in-philadel

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      NBC Sports 2026 NFL GM rankings

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Paa Langfart
      Canes vs Canadians Gm 2 Rd 3 7pm

      By Paa Langfart · Posted

      Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • frankw
      Mean girls

      By frankw · Posted

      I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...