Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Anderson and (insert pick #17-36 QB selection) more bang for the buck?


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

Outside of Bryce Young, and even he has size problems, none of these QB's look like they are separating themselves from one another. Now, I don't think that's bad for us. If we don't have a shot at Bryce Young or C.J. Stroud, I would like to see us take Will Anderson, pair him up with Burns because pretty much all the other QB's are a big gamble rn and we already have Corral on the roster. Now here is where it gets interesting, because outside of the top 2 prospects a lot of the rookie QB's look like good upside guys with huge red flags. I say use our 2nd's as ammo for the back half of the 1st round if guys start falling or you can even sit back and wait to see who goes first if you don't believe that much in Will Levis. 

Our defense gets jolts to our LoS run defense and Pass Rush which are both in need of help, this would also help at our corner positions indirectly. On offense, if we end up at say pick #3 or something our new HC (I'm fully aboard the Shane Steichen train, look what he did with Hurbert and Hurts, so he knows what to look for) might have his eye on someone like K.J. Jefferson who models himself after Cam:

Or maybe Levis slides to 17 and that's enough ammo to package for our 2 2nd's to move up?

I guess the point here is, there is a shitload of great QB's this draft with question marks, if we end up looking at Levis or Will Anderson, I say take the sure thing in Anderson and lets get one of these lotto tickets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what Washington kept saying when they drafted Young, Sweat, Payne and Allen…

How’s that working out?

Or Denver when they decided to take Chubb to pair with Miller?

Both teams are still a mess at the QB position.

Take the f’n QB.

At this point I’ll roll the dice on QB4 over any other positions 1

  • Pie 7
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop with this nonsense.  Anderson is nowhere near the 3-Down lineman prospects you see in the top-5.  He's a Chaisson/Burns/Paye type guy.  Nowhere near a Hutch, Thibodeaux, Bosa, Walker, etc. 

This weird obsession people are developing for BPA and [insert sleeper QB here] is not a model for success. 

There's better fitting DEs in this draft for what we need.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the biggest bang for buck will be trading down.

The best QB in this draft is 5'10" 190lbs. Even with a solid OL, that's going to be a big point of concern (especially for a team that's had injuries rack up at the QB position). If the team moved on from Burns, then yea go get Anderson but unless the team is looking to move to a 3-4 base I don't see it being a good fit.

With all of the clamoring over the importance of picks for rebuilding after Burns wasn't traded, the lack of a clear #1 franchise QB, and the #1 player basically being a copy of our current premiere pass rusher, making a trade similar to what was made for Trey Lance would net the team those beloved draft picks and give the coach that "free year" with Matt Corral at QB to see what he's got (he'd be in the discussion for QB1 in this year's draft if he stayed for his Sr year). If he's ass trash, then there's ammo to move up to #1 for Drake Maye 👀

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

This is what Washington kept saying when they drafted Young, Sweat, Payne and Allen…

How’s that working out?

Or Denver when they decided to take Chubb to pair with Miller?

Both teams are still a mess at the QB position.

Take the f’n QB.

At this point I’ll roll the dice on QB4 over any other positions 1

Yeah basically

besides if the QB flames out were in primo arch Manning window anyways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, davos said:

Stop with this nonsense.  Anderson is nowhere near the 3-Down lineman prospects you see in the top-5.  He's a Chaisson/Burns/Paye type guy.  Nowhere near a Hutch, Thibodeaux, Bosa, Walker, etc. 

This weird obsession people are developing for BPA and [insert sleeper QB here] is not a model for success. 

There's better fitting DEs in this draft for what we need.  

I don’t know why so many think it’s a good idea to get cute and settle for a lesser prospect at the most important position in sports, every single draft

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I think this will be one of those drafts were the top guys at QB are over-hyped and the guys a few spots back aren't all that different in the long run.

Who is your mid-tier sleeper?  Penix is getting overlooked IMO, Richardson has the crazy ceiling, but is raw as a passer....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Growl said:

I don’t know why so many think it’s a good idea to get cute and settle for a lesser prospect at the most important position in sports, every single draft

I cannot give this enough pie.

QB is not the most important position in football.  It's the most important position in team sports.  Getting a young stud on a rookie contract for five years gives you a window to go from mediocre to contender.  Until you have that guy, you spend every draft trying to get him at any slot required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...