Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Anderson and (insert pick #17-36 QB selection) more bang for the buck?


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

Outside of Bryce Young, and even he has size problems, none of these QB's look like they are separating themselves from one another. Now, I don't think that's bad for us. If we don't have a shot at Bryce Young or C.J. Stroud, I would like to see us take Will Anderson, pair him up with Burns because pretty much all the other QB's are a big gamble rn and we already have Corral on the roster. Now here is where it gets interesting, because outside of the top 2 prospects a lot of the rookie QB's look like good upside guys with huge red flags. I say use our 2nd's as ammo for the back half of the 1st round if guys start falling or you can even sit back and wait to see who goes first if you don't believe that much in Will Levis. 

Our defense gets jolts to our LoS run defense and Pass Rush which are both in need of help, this would also help at our corner positions indirectly. On offense, if we end up at say pick #3 or something our new HC (I'm fully aboard the Shane Steichen train, look what he did with Hurbert and Hurts, so he knows what to look for) might have his eye on someone like K.J. Jefferson who models himself after Cam:

Or maybe Levis slides to 17 and that's enough ammo to package for our 2 2nd's to move up?

I guess the point here is, there is a shitload of great QB's this draft with question marks, if we end up looking at Levis or Will Anderson, I say take the sure thing in Anderson and lets get one of these lotto tickets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what Washington kept saying when they drafted Young, Sweat, Payne and Allen…

How’s that working out?

Or Denver when they decided to take Chubb to pair with Miller?

Both teams are still a mess at the QB position.

Take the f’n QB.

At this point I’ll roll the dice on QB4 over any other positions 1

  • Pie 7
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop with this nonsense.  Anderson is nowhere near the 3-Down lineman prospects you see in the top-5.  He's a Chaisson/Burns/Paye type guy.  Nowhere near a Hutch, Thibodeaux, Bosa, Walker, etc. 

This weird obsession people are developing for BPA and [insert sleeper QB here] is not a model for success. 

There's better fitting DEs in this draft for what we need.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the biggest bang for buck will be trading down.

The best QB in this draft is 5'10" 190lbs. Even with a solid OL, that's going to be a big point of concern (especially for a team that's had injuries rack up at the QB position). If the team moved on from Burns, then yea go get Anderson but unless the team is looking to move to a 3-4 base I don't see it being a good fit.

With all of the clamoring over the importance of picks for rebuilding after Burns wasn't traded, the lack of a clear #1 franchise QB, and the #1 player basically being a copy of our current premiere pass rusher, making a trade similar to what was made for Trey Lance would net the team those beloved draft picks and give the coach that "free year" with Matt Corral at QB to see what he's got (he'd be in the discussion for QB1 in this year's draft if he stayed for his Sr year). If he's ass trash, then there's ammo to move up to #1 for Drake Maye 👀

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

This is what Washington kept saying when they drafted Young, Sweat, Payne and Allen…

How’s that working out?

Or Denver when they decided to take Chubb to pair with Miller?

Both teams are still a mess at the QB position.

Take the f’n QB.

At this point I’ll roll the dice on QB4 over any other positions 1

Yeah basically

besides if the QB flames out were in primo arch Manning window anyways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, davos said:

Stop with this nonsense.  Anderson is nowhere near the 3-Down lineman prospects you see in the top-5.  He's a Chaisson/Burns/Paye type guy.  Nowhere near a Hutch, Thibodeaux, Bosa, Walker, etc. 

This weird obsession people are developing for BPA and [insert sleeper QB here] is not a model for success. 

There's better fitting DEs in this draft for what we need.  

I don’t know why so many think it’s a good idea to get cute and settle for a lesser prospect at the most important position in sports, every single draft

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I think this will be one of those drafts were the top guys at QB are over-hyped and the guys a few spots back aren't all that different in the long run.

Who is your mid-tier sleeper?  Penix is getting overlooked IMO, Richardson has the crazy ceiling, but is raw as a passer....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Growl said:

I don’t know why so many think it’s a good idea to get cute and settle for a lesser prospect at the most important position in sports, every single draft

I cannot give this enough pie.

QB is not the most important position in football.  It's the most important position in team sports.  Getting a young stud on a rookie contract for five years gives you a window to go from mediocre to contender.  Until you have that guy, you spend every draft trying to get him at any slot required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you think the NFL or NBA are worried about lawsuits or something like officiating scandals bringing down their empires, I think you're giving them way too much credit.  Go watch the documentary on Tim Donaghy in the NBA and who was involved and what he did.  One of the guys he worked with is still one of the league's top trusted officials, especially for playoff games.  IIRC, they have records showing he was the person Donaghy exchanged phone calls with the most during his time fixing games.  And his reputation is beyond horrible...  but he's untouchable.  I also encourage you to go watch DeMaurice Smith's Breakfast Club interview.  He laid out how for fans, we just know these organizations as a singular, public entity - like THE Carolina Panthers, or THE Dallas Cowboys- but, in actuality, he said that is the public-facing identity of an umbrella company comprised of countless smaller businesses and LLCs.  He is tasked with trying to audit their books, and he said these organizations are structured in such a way that even HE can't ever know what they truly make in a year.  It's impossible.  And now, this is just me speculating on top of that, but you think the league's themselves are structured similarly?  They are untouchable.  IIRC, they are recognized legally as "entertainment" organizations, thus protecting themselves in cases where integrity would come into question.  They are protected, layer, behind layer, behind layer.  Betting works because there is some degree of control that ensures the house wins more than it loses, by a lot.  The short of it is, "Give them bread and circuses" and all that jazz.  These leagues operate with total impunity.  Again, it's not just because I'm a Panthers fan, but even if I wasn't and I watched Superbowl 50 without a dog in the fight I would walk away feeling like that outcome was controlled and influenced HEAVILY to where the Panthers were not given a level playing field.  The same poo happens every Sunday to teams playing those blue blood franchises and ones with intriguing storylines. 
    • This Chuba isn't getting traded, but Rico very well could be in a few weeks if he keeps playing well in a tandem backfield with Chuba also playing well. I think we'd end up going with a two headed monster in that case, but with Rico being on a one year deal, it does open up the possibility of a contending team offering up a decent pick for him.  Depending on the recovery of Hampton, I could see someone like the Chargers giving us a 4th for him if they think he could put them over the top, he would fit nicely in a Harbaugh system I think. If it comes to that, we need to make that trade, as I can't see any way we re-sign Rico with all our other needs and getting Brooks back too.  And he's not going to get a contract big enough to get us any comp picks in return, especially if/when we sign a FA or two ourselves.  So if we're not going to bring him back, the prudent decision would really be to get a draft pick for him at the deadline.
    • It's all about what they do at QB. It's clear the rest of the roster is improving. If they commit long term to Young because he's being carried to wins then we're fuged. I think that's a separate issue to finally being competitive again.  There's no QB in this Draft that's going to ride in on his white horse on day one and save us, so we absolutely shouldn't be playing for Draft position. 
×
×
  • Create New...